CesareLombroso
Madmaxista
- Desde
- 27 Abr 2016
- Mensajes
- 11.813
- Reputación
- 15.283
delito de repruebo y con insultos.
Magufada?
Articulo de hoy en la revista donde todos vosotros, pobres, querriais estar
FORBES
Forbes Welcome
A mamarla!
Tech
JAN 13, 2015 @ 07:55 AM 420,619 The Little Black Book of Billionaire Secrets
Controversial Paper Suggests Wi-Fi Exposure More Dangerous To Kids Than Previously Thought
Robert J. Szczerba , CONTRIBUTOR
Exploring the future of science and tech
Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.
Most parents would be concerned if their children had significant exposure to lead, chloroform, gasoline fumes, or the pesticide DDT. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IRIC), part of the United Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO), classifies these and more than 250 other agents as Class 2B Carcinogens - possibly carcinogenic to humans. Another entry on that same list is radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF/EMF). The main sources of RF/EMF are radios, televisions, microwave ovens, cell phones, and Wi-Fi devices.
Uh-oh. Not another diatribe about the dangers of our modern communication systems? Obviously, these devices and the resulting fields are extremely (and increasingly) common in modern society. Even if we want to, we can’t eliminate our exposure, or our children’s, to RF/EMF. But, we may need to limit that exposure, when possible.
That was among the conclusions of a controversial survey article published in the Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure entitled “Why children absorb more microwave radiation than adults: The consequences.” From an analysis of others studies, the authors argue that children and adolescents are at considerable risk from devices that radiate microwaves (and that adults are at a lower, but still significant, risk). The ***owing points were offered for consideration:
Children absorb a greater amount of microwave radiation than adults.
Fetuses are even more vulnerable than children. Therefore pregnant women should avoid exposing their fetus to microwave radiation.
Adolescent girls and women should not place cellphones in their bras or in hijabs (headscarf).
Cellphone manual warnings make clear an overexposure problem exists.
Government warnings have been issued but most of the public are unaware of such warnings.
Current exposure limits are inadequate and should be revised.
Wireless devices are radio transmitters, not toys. Selling toys that use them should be monitored more closely.
Children and fetuses absorb more microwave radiation, according to the authors, because their bodies are relatively smaller, their skulls are thinner, and their brain tissue is more absorbent.
Do the benefits of immersive learning applications outweigh the dangers of increased cellular and Wi-Fi exposure for children? (Image credit: Intel Free Press via Wikipedia)
Recommended by Forbes
Understanding Healthcare's Top Technology Hazard
Copper Is The New Gold Standard For Saving Lives
Re-Engineering Healthcare To Eliminate Preventable Deaths
Why Your Insurance Company Will Pay You to Take Your Medicine
MOST POPULAR Photos: The Richest Person In Every State
+57,566 VIEWS Galaxy S8 Vs Galaxy S7: What's The Difference?
MOST POPULAR Photos: The 10 Most Dangerous U.S. Cities
MOST POPULAR Stan Lee Introduces Augmented Reality For His Kids Universe
This is not a call to throw out all electronic devices. However, at the very least, it should open up the discussion about different safety levels for adults versus children. Hopefully more longitudinal studies will be done to verify or contradict the assumptions so far. In the meantime, are the government’s current regulations adequate? The exposure levels they warn against haven’t seem to have been updated for more than 19 years.
In a Network World opinion article ominously titled “Is Wi-Fi killing us...slowly?” columnist Mark Gibbs makes the point that “... laws and warnings are all very well but it’s pretty much certain that all restrictions on products that use microwave technology will err on the safe side; that is, the side that’s safe for industry, not the side of what's safe for society.” Gibbs then added this ominous closing question, “Will we look back (sadly) in fifty or a hundred years and marvel at how Wi-Fi and cellphones were responsible for the biggest health crisis in human history?”
But, short of that worst-case scenario, the topic certainly merits more scrutiny, and perhaps some common sense limits on what devices our children use, and for how long.
---------- Post added 31-mar-2017 at 13:47 ----------
El informe de la Comisión Nacional de Rusia para la protección contra la radiación no ionizante "evaluación higiénico-sanitarias de los teléfonos celulares en Rusia: problemas y soluciones actuales", Moscú, 2001
Autores del informe:
Grigoriev YG
Presidente del Comité Nacional de Rusia no Ionizante Protección Radiológica, un miembro del comité científico del programa de la OMS "Campos electromagnéticos y salud" MD, PhD
Stepanov VS
Director Adjunto del Centro Estatal de Investigaciones del Instituto de Biofísica del Ministerio de Salud de Rusia, el experto principal de la Comisión de Sanidad del Estado y epidemiológica Normalización bajo el Ministerio de Salud de Rusia, Ph.D.
YP dedos
Jefe de los campos electromagnéticos de laboratorio del Instituto de Investigación de Medicina del Trabajo de los carneros, MD, profesor
Grigoriev OA
Director del Centro para la Seguridad Electromagnética en el SRC Instituto de Biofísica
Lukyanov SN
Investigador Principal del Instituto de Biofísica SRC, Ministerio de Salud, MD, PhD rusa
En algunos países (por ejemplo, Estados Unidos, Reino Unido, Suecia) tienen un programa nacional, e incluso departamental (por ejemplo, la Comisión Federal de Comunicaciones tiene un programa de seguridad humana electromagnética "Programa de seguridad de RF"). Sin embargo, el papel de las agencias gubernamentales y organizaciones internacionales se reduce a la coordinación de las actividades y el establecimiento de políticas, así como explicar la situación de la población. Hacer investigación en tareas más específicas llevadas a cabo por y en detrimento de las empresas o asociaciones de empresas de la industria de las telecomunicaciones, y sólo parcialmente pagados por los gobiernos nacionales y las 244bis COST. Por lo tanto, el trabajo, registrada en la base de datos del programa "Los campos electromagnéticos y la salud humana", la OMS, fue financiado por Deutsche Telekom, Nokia, Motorola, Telstra, Swiss Telecom, nacional finlandesa, Telecom Australia, entre otros. Entre las compañías primeras tres encuestas anuales llevadas a cabo de manera continua y tienen el centros y unidades de investigación relevante.
Última edición:
