Vox official accuses Alvise Pérez of unproven claims
A user linked to Vox questions Alvise Pérez's ties to CNI and funding. Alvise blames two Vox officials for the attack.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Vox official accuses Alvise Pérez of unproven claims
A social media user presenting himself as a Vox communications official, known as "the Jewish guy from Vox," has launched a series of questions about Luis "Alvise" Pérez Fernández: from his contacts with the CNI in Leeds to the origin of his financing. The trigger was a message reviewing his career—UPyD, Ciudadanos, Vox—and insinuating that his privileged information might come from official sources. Alvise's response was immediate: according to the official, the leader of Se Acabó la Fiesta stated in an interview that behind the account are two national Vox communications officials, although he had previously said it was a Salou councilor. The controversy is served.
Source of information: CNI or police contacts?
The central accusation is that Alvise handles information he should not have access to. The initial message asks directly: "Did you have contacts with the CNI in Leeds, Alvise?" It also mentions he has a Civil Guard brother and frequently accesses police files. Several messages in the thread claim Alvise gets his published info from the CNI, though no proof is provided. Others suggest he obtains it through security force contacts. The discussion shifts to whether publishing data protected by Spanish privacy laws (LOPD), such as a user's IP, is illegal.
Alvise's assets: €495 sneakers and donations
The initial message details personal expenses: Dolce Gabbana Portofino sneakers costing €495, Gucci belts over €400. It asks if these luxuries are funded by trinc donations. Alvise has been asking for donations for years, a legal route, but the message hints the money could have another source. Mentions include the UAE, the King Emeritus, and an alleged briefcase. A possible embargo preventing him from donating his salary if elected is also alluded to. None of these accusations are presented with evidence, only as questions.
Break with Vox and Steegmann's role
The initial message reviews Alvise's relationship with Vox: entry in 2020, support from the comms team, and break in March 2022. A lunch between Alvise, Kiko Méndez Monasterio, and Santiago Abascal is mentioned as a turning point. Conflict with MP Steegmann is cited as the trigger. Alvise allegedly wanted more control and power within the party; when denied, he distanced himself. Since then, he attacks Vox on his Telegram channel. One message claims Vox closed ranks around Steegmann, precipitating the exit.
Reactions: divided defenders and critics
Positions are polarized. Some defend Alvise as a scourge of corruption, comparing his work to Wikileaks. Others criticize him for making unproven accusations and using tools like Pegasus. Some note the accusing account is suspicious due to its recent creation. Debate exists on whether Alvise seeks immunity (aforamiento) for pending proceedings. The discussion devolves into personal attacks, making it hard to separate fact from fiction.
Electoral context: Se Acabó la Fiesta and salary raffle
Alvise runs in the European elections under the banner Se Acabó la Fiesta. He promises to raffle off his salary if elected, a measure the initial message questions if he is under embargo. The party name ironically contrasts with the luxury tastes attributed to him. The campaign focuses on denouncing political corruption, but accusations regarding his funding and methods could erode his credibility. The thread reflects extreme polarization: some see a hero, others an opportunist.
Media role and lack of proof
The initial message insists it cannot affirm anything, only ask. However, the tone is accusatory. Former friends describing him as "an extortionist who works on commission" are mentioned. An alleged attempt to hack Jenny Hermoso's phone and a request for money from Rubiales are also referenced. None of this is supported by documents. The thread discussion reflects the difficulty of distinguishing legitimate whistleblowing from interested rumors. Alvise, for his part, has promised to prove everything in court, according to the initial message itself.
The Vox official challenged Alvise to state on his Telegram what is false in the published content. Alvise has not yet publicly responded to this challenge. The ball is in his court. Meanwhile, the shadow of doubt lingers over the origin of his information and money. And over whether this is a smokescreen or the beginning of something bigger.
A social media user presenting himself as a Vox communications official, known as "the Jewish guy from Vox," has launched a series of questions about Luis "Alvise" Pérez Fernández: from his contacts with the CNI in Leeds to the origin of his financing. The trigger was a message reviewing his career—UPyD, Ciudadanos, Vox—and insinuating that his privileged information might come from official sources. Alvise's response was immediate: according to the official, the leader of Se Acabó la Fiesta stated in an interview that behind the account are two national Vox communications officials, although he had previously said it was a Salou councilor. The controversy is served.
Source of information: CNI or police contacts?
The central accusation is that Alvise handles information he should not have access to. The initial message asks directly: "Did you have contacts with the CNI in Leeds, Alvise?" It also mentions he has a Civil Guard brother and frequently accesses police files. Several messages in the thread claim Alvise gets his published info from the CNI, though no proof is provided. Others suggest he obtains it through security force contacts. The discussion shifts to whether publishing data protected by Spanish privacy laws (LOPD), such as a user's IP, is illegal.
Alvise's assets: €495 sneakers and donations
The initial message details personal expenses: Dolce Gabbana Portofino sneakers costing €495, Gucci belts over €400. It asks if these luxuries are funded by trinc donations. Alvise has been asking for donations for years, a legal route, but the message hints the money could have another source. Mentions include the UAE, the King Emeritus, and an alleged briefcase. A possible embargo preventing him from donating his salary if elected is also alluded to. None of these accusations are presented with evidence, only as questions.
Break with Vox and Steegmann's role
The initial message reviews Alvise's relationship with Vox: entry in 2020, support from the comms team, and break in March 2022. A lunch between Alvise, Kiko Méndez Monasterio, and Santiago Abascal is mentioned as a turning point. Conflict with MP Steegmann is cited as the trigger. Alvise allegedly wanted more control and power within the party; when denied, he distanced himself. Since then, he attacks Vox on his Telegram channel. One message claims Vox closed ranks around Steegmann, precipitating the exit.
Reactions: divided defenders and critics
Positions are polarized. Some defend Alvise as a scourge of corruption, comparing his work to Wikileaks. Others criticize him for making unproven accusations and using tools like Pegasus. Some note the accusing account is suspicious due to its recent creation. Debate exists on whether Alvise seeks immunity (aforamiento) for pending proceedings. The discussion devolves into personal attacks, making it hard to separate fact from fiction.
Electoral context: Se Acabó la Fiesta and salary raffle
Alvise runs in the European elections under the banner Se Acabó la Fiesta. He promises to raffle off his salary if elected, a measure the initial message questions if he is under embargo. The party name ironically contrasts with the luxury tastes attributed to him. The campaign focuses on denouncing political corruption, but accusations regarding his funding and methods could erode his credibility. The thread reflects extreme polarization: some see a hero, others an opportunist.
Media role and lack of proof
The initial message insists it cannot affirm anything, only ask. However, the tone is accusatory. Former friends describing him as "an extortionist who works on commission" are mentioned. An alleged attempt to hack Jenny Hermoso's phone and a request for money from Rubiales are also referenced. None of this is supported by documents. The thread discussion reflects the difficulty of distinguishing legitimate whistleblowing from interested rumors. Alvise, for his part, has promised to prove everything in court, according to the initial message itself.
The Vox official challenged Alvise to state on his Telegram what is false in the published content. Alvise has not yet publicly responded to this challenge. The ball is in his court. Meanwhile, the shadow of doubt lingers over the origin of his information and money. And over whether this is a smokescreen or the beginning of something bigger.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (125 replies).
More summaries
-
Alvise's MEPs call him 'the most corrupt of the corrupt'
Two MEPs from Se Acabó La Fiesta accuse Alvise of 'having lies in his DNA' and being 'the most corrupt of the corrupt' after his management in...
-
Germany jails xenophobic chanters for up to five years
Germany pursues those who sang xenophobic slogans to L'Amour Toujours: dismissals, university expulsions and penalties of up to 5 years.
-
The Party's Over: Housing Sales Continue to Fall -5.1% in July!!!
Spanish housing sales dropped 5.1% in July, with a 3% year-to-date decline. The real estate market is cooling.
-
PSOE keeps 15 seats in Extremadura despite candidate indictment
In Spain's Extremadura region, the PSOE retained 15 seats amid a 60% abstention rate. The PP won with 29 seats, while Vox secured 13.
-
Spain's €570 unemployment subsidy: existing since 2024
The €570 benefit for those without full unemployment rights existed before. The change is the higher initial amount, though payments decrease over time.
-
Evo Morales Defends Bolivia Camp with Wooden Spears
Viral video shows Evo Morales protected by 2,000 people with wooden spears. The scene mocks security protocols, drawing comparisons to Age of Empires and Mad Max.