The decree that will be validated without returning to Parliament
The Government re-enacts decrees and dissolves the Spanish Parliament: validation now falls to the Permanent Deputation, where PSOE and SUMAR hold a majority. An analysis of the move.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The decree that will be validated without returning to Parliament
The Government re-enacts the decrees and, immediately afterwards, the Prime Minister dissolves the Cortes Generales (the Spanish Parliament) and calls elections. Validation of those texts no longer falls to the full chamber, but to the Permanent Fruta, where PSOE and SUMAR together hold a majority. The move, attributed to the Prime Minister, turns a parliamentary procedure into a calendar operation. The question hanging over the whole affair is simple: can a caretaker government keep legislating by decree while the country heads to the polls? The answer the manoeuvre gives is yes, as long as the body doing the validating is the right one.
What the Permanent Fruta is and why it decides here
The Permanent Fruta is the body that replaces the Congress of Deputies when it is dissolved or between sessions. Its composition reflects the majority of the outgoing chamber, not the one that emerges from the ballot box. With PSOE and SUMAR holding a majority in that body, validation of the decrees is guaranteed without any need to negotiate with PNV or Junts. The newspaper El Diario notes that PNV remains necessary for other votes, but not for this one. The move, then, is not technical: it is arithmetic.
The precedent that breaks the rulebook
The Constitution allows the Cortes to be dissolved, but the unwritten rulebook said a caretaker government does not legislate. The most repeated answer in the analysis is that a caretaker government cannot approve anything of substance. Yet the accumulated record shows the opposite: the country has already been governed without a budget, and that did not stop the machinery. The difference now is that the decree is validated in a reduced body, with a known majority and without the wear and tear of a public debate. The opposition calls it a breach of the law and an institutional coup. The accusation is serious and, as of this discussion, no court ruling backs it up.
The electoral calculation behind the circus
The political reading is that the Prime Minister is not waiting until March of next year, when the wear would be greater. Instead, he stages the Mar i Carmen circus — the housing affair — to send a message to the electorate: vote for me and I'll fix the problem. The calculation assumes that housing mobilises the left and that the PP remains flat. If he wins, the most repeated analysis says he is not leaving even with boiling water. If he loses, the incoming government will swallow the €2.5-per-litre price and the accumulated mess. The bet is all or nothing.
What remains to be resolved
The exact point where the analysis gets stuck is the legality of the manoeuvre. One camp argues that the Permanent Fruta can validate decrees without any problem. Another replies that dissolution turns the Government into an executive with no real legislative capacity. The discrepancy is not settled by parliamentary arithmetic, but by constitutional interpretation. And there, nobody has the final word yet.
The Government re-enacts the decrees and, immediately afterwards, the Prime Minister dissolves the Cortes Generales (the Spanish Parliament) and calls elections. Validation of those texts no longer falls to the full chamber, but to the Permanent Fruta, where PSOE and SUMAR together hold a majority. The move, attributed to the Prime Minister, turns a parliamentary procedure into a calendar operation. The question hanging over the whole affair is simple: can a caretaker government keep legislating by decree while the country heads to the polls? The answer the manoeuvre gives is yes, as long as the body doing the validating is the right one.
What the Permanent Fruta is and why it decides here
The Permanent Fruta is the body that replaces the Congress of Deputies when it is dissolved or between sessions. Its composition reflects the majority of the outgoing chamber, not the one that emerges from the ballot box. With PSOE and SUMAR holding a majority in that body, validation of the decrees is guaranteed without any need to negotiate with PNV or Junts. The newspaper El Diario notes that PNV remains necessary for other votes, but not for this one. The move, then, is not technical: it is arithmetic.
The precedent that breaks the rulebook
The Constitution allows the Cortes to be dissolved, but the unwritten rulebook said a caretaker government does not legislate. The most repeated answer in the analysis is that a caretaker government cannot approve anything of substance. Yet the accumulated record shows the opposite: the country has already been governed without a budget, and that did not stop the machinery. The difference now is that the decree is validated in a reduced body, with a known majority and without the wear and tear of a public debate. The opposition calls it a breach of the law and an institutional coup. The accusation is serious and, as of this discussion, no court ruling backs it up.
The electoral calculation behind the circus
The political reading is that the Prime Minister is not waiting until March of next year, when the wear would be greater. Instead, he stages the Mar i Carmen circus — the housing affair — to send a message to the electorate: vote for me and I'll fix the problem. The calculation assumes that housing mobilises the left and that the PP remains flat. If he wins, the most repeated analysis says he is not leaving even with boiling water. If he loses, the incoming government will swallow the €2.5-per-litre price and the accumulated mess. The bet is all or nothing.
What remains to be resolved
The exact point where the analysis gets stuck is the legality of the manoeuvre. One camp argues that the Permanent Fruta can validate decrees without any problem. Another replies that dissolution turns the Government into an executive with no real legislative capacity. The discrepancy is not settled by parliamentary arithmetic, but by constitutional interpretation. And there, nobody has the final word yet.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (17 replies).
More summaries
-
Spain's Permanent Deputation housing decrees spark legal controversy
The Spanish government submits rejected housing decrees to the Permanent Deputation. Opposition claims fraud of law ahead of the November 29 elections.
-
Spain's left collapses: PSOE, Sumar and Podemos fall below 35%
PP and Vox come close to a constitutional majority while Spain's left falls below 35%, according to a poll by El Español.
-
Junts votes down decrees, leaving Sánchez without a majority
Junts rejects the Spanish government's decrees, including the housing package, leaving Sánchez without a majority to legislate and with the question of an early election hanging over him.
-
Sánchez vows to stay on for four more years, 'one way or another'
Pedro Sánchez says he will remain in power 'one way or another' for four more years. Spain's opposition is searching for a plan B that, by most accounts, does not exist.
-
Spain's Ione Belarra ordered to pay judge 9,000 euros for calling him corrupt
Ione Belarra has been ordered to pay 9,000 euros to judge García-Castellón for calling him corrupt on social media. The sum, three times the minimum wage, and the irony of asking for donations.
-
Begoña Gómez to stand trial on four charges after final court appearance
Judge Peinado has told Begoña Gómez she will face trial on four charges after the preliminary hearing. The prosecutors' office had sought dismissal, while private accusers pushed for trial.