Spanish Forum Doxxing Scandal Divides Community

The Police Officer Doxxing Case That Splits the Forum

A full name, a city, a football team, and a girlfriend with a twin. With these details, a post in the "Guardería" subforum triggered a storm that has lasted for 542 days. The author claims to have found "all information" about a user known as @Policía Pérez, accusing him of previously doxxing others. The proposal is simple: return the favor. "Should we give him a good DOXING so he crumbles?", they ask. Democracy, they say, has spoken.

The leaked material includes name, surnames, city of residence, football team, education, height, weight, and even the start date of a romantic relationship. The alleged victim denies everything: "All accounts are closed," he responds, claiming it is a "bluff to scare people." The discussion, far from dying down, has turned into a standoff over the limits of internet anonymity.

What Is Known About the Alleged Doxxing and Who Leaked It

The initial message, posted by a user identifying as @La cualquiera del entorno, claims to have found the information "purely by chance" while having breakfast. The method described is rudimentary: searching online, reaching Instagram, jumping to the girlfriend's account, and then to TikTok. "No twins, no blondes, no breast implants, no controller," they state. Everything the alleged victim supposedly shared on the forum is, according to this version, "pure invention."

The response came quickly. The accused, @Policía Pérez, denies that the accounts are open and challenges them: "I am so sure you have my permission to post whatever photos or social media you want." The standoff continues: the accuser claims to have more than twenty verified matches between the real person and the forum user. "It is mathematically impossible that it isn't him," they insist.

Cross-Accusations of Previous Doxxing

The core of the conflict is not the leak itself, but its justification. Those proposing the doxxing argue that the accused had already done it to others: "He doxxed Ratona and we found out she was a whale from the Canary Islands," one states. They also mention another user, Toni Agut, adding that @Policía Pérez himself had asked days prior why a third party hadn't been doxxed. "They deserved it, but he has doxxed before," they conclude.

The accused does not respond to these specific allegations. He simply calls the leak a "ridiculous act" and predicts there will be no proof. The discussion heats up when a private photo allegedly antiestéticaturing a minor is mentioned. "Go ahead, I look forward to seeing more evidence," responds the one who threw down the gauntlet.

Doxxing as Revenge: Arguments For and Against

Those supporting the leak rely on the idea of karma. "If he did it, which I haven't seen, he deserves to be doxxed," summarizes one user. Another elevates it to a category: "It would be one of the most powerful instances of forum karma we've seen in years." The logic is circular: those who abusa others' anonymity lose their right to it.

Opposing this, the most repeated stance is to leave the guy alone. "A true WrestleMania fan doesn't deserve that," writes one. "Leave the kid alone," concludes another. However, many highly rated messages don't address the substance: they complain about the lack of proof. "So much talk about doxxing and not a single photo," summarizes one user. "Zero graphic or audiovisual evidence," adds another. Several note that the thread has devolved into "delusions" and a "ridiculous spectacle" without substance.

The Final Twist: When Doxxing Becomes Spectacle

As days passed, the original issue was buried. A user identifying as @PROARI@ JUSTA Y LEGAL burst in to divert attention to personal disputes, accusing several participants of being multi-accounts and harassing her. "I'm not surprised you're the same ASTASTASTASTASTASTAST [pedophile]," she wrote, in a message highlighted by the community for its aggression. From then on, the thread mutated into an exchange of insults, personal photos, and references to third parties unrelated to the initial leak.

The most common conclusion among top-rated comments is frustration. "I don't understand this thread. In the end, no name, no twins, nothing," summarizes one user. "Well, yes, something." The promise of a "healthy therapeutic doxxing" ended in disappointment: not a single piece of visual evidence, nor independent confirmation. Just a name, a city, and a football team. And the unresolved doubt of whether it was all a bluff or half-hearted revenge.

---

Key Facts

• The initial message claims to have found more than 20 matches between the real person and the forum user.
• According to the leak, the accused's romantic relationship began on August 6, 2023.
• The thread has been active for 542 days and has 121 replies.
• The alleged victim denies the accounts are open and calls the leak a "bluff."