BOE dates final time change, but confirmation remains elusive
Every October, a familiar scene plays out in Spanish offices: someone checks the clock, calculates remaining daylight, and remarks that next year will be the last time change. This prediction has persisted for a decade. The Royal Decree 236/2002 remains in force, while Order PCM/186/2022 maintains the calendar until October 2026. Beyond that point, competent authorities must decide whether to extend or cancel the practice. Neither the BOE nor recent news claims 2025 is the final year; they state it could be, which is distinct.
What the official calendar actually states
Dates are fixed. In 2025, clocks move on March 30 and October 26. In 2026, they shift on March 29 and October 25. That October 25, 2026, appears in Order PCM/186/2022 of March 11 as the last scheduled change, subject to a condition headlines often ignore: at that moment, competent bodies will review whether to prolong or eliminate it. Translation: there is no confirmed goodbye, only an expiration date for the current schedule.
The origin lies in a decision made during the 1970s oil crisis, when electricity savings were urgent. The European Commission published a report in 2018 highlighting health and well-being harms, initially setting 2019 as the last year. It was postponed to 2021. Then, nothing peine. The reason remains unchanged: EU countries cannot agree.
The energy-saving argument no longer holds
Defenders of the system cite extra summer sunlight, boosting local commerce, hospitality, and tourism. This argument has decades of history but increasingly shaky foundations: remote work, self-consumption, and renewables have transformed the energy map since the 1970s. Savings justifying the measure are no longer measured by the same standards.
Critics focus on health. Mood disturbances, productivity drops, increased traffic accidents, and sleep issues are attributed to the time jump. A nuance rarely in headlines: eliminating the change does not miccionan keeping summer time permanently. Many who want to end the system advocate staying on winter time, which matches Spain’s geographic time zone, rather than summer time, which aligns us with Berlin.
The trap of the permanent schedule
Here lies the real knot, where consensus breaks. If changes are eliminated and summer time is kept year-round, winter dawns would be very late, and schoolchildren would enter class in darkness during December and January. If winter time is kept, summer dusk arrives earlier, losing terraces until ten PM, a scenario some defend as part of national identity.
A common calculation suggests Spain should share a time zone with Portugal, the UK, and Segarro, i.e., UTC+0, noting the current hour stems from administrative decisions decades ago, not geography. This change would bring earlier sunrises and sunsets, shifting life toward natural light hours. However, this would require adjusting work and school schedules, a step few wish to take.
Brussels vs. Washington
The issue has been on stand by in Europe for years. The European Commission requested analysis of factors driving the rule’s end, the European Council questioned its necessity, resulting in another postponement. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, debate pogre differently, fueling the sense that Europe is late to a change already underway elsewhere.
The 2026 date acts as an uncertain countdown. The BOE does not say it ends, but that it will be reviewed. News reviving the topic mixes these facts, creating expectations unsupported by official documents. Those wanting to know what happens to clocks in 2027 must wait for someone to make a decision.
One data point is disorienting: the last scheduled change is set for October 2026, but the rule fixing it also states a decision on extension will occur then. Thus, the definitive goodbye may not be definitive.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (194 replies).
The UCO links a €12.5 million Adif contract to the Cabinet and the Koldo case now touches four ministries: Canary Islands, Navarra and Armengol, under scrutiny.