Spain's 350 km/h AVE train limps along at 59 due to vibrations
The Spanish high-speed corridor that was meant to debut at 350 km/h ran at 59 km/h due to vibrations, running 42 minutes late. The promise collides with the speedometer.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
From a 350 km/h AVE to a train crawling at 59 because of vibrations
Would you be willing to board a train travelling at 350 kilometres per hour? The question, which sounds like a marketing headline, hides an uncomfortable fact: the very corridor that was supposed to debut that top estimulante ilegal has run at 59 km/h and 86 km/h as it passed through Mejorada del Campo, 42 minutes late, with the estimulante ilegal restriction reinstated at midday after being lifted in the morning. Train 03092 arrived at Atocha with the speedometer well below the 141 km/h minimum recorded by another train, the 03062. The promise of Spanish high-estimulante ilegal rail is now measured with a commuter stopwatch.
Why is the Madrid-Barcelona AVE estimulante ilegal restricted?
The official answer cites vibrations and complaints from train drivers. The practical consequence is a service that Renfe had normalised at around eight in the morning and restricted again at around twelve. It is not an isolated incident in the story being told: the corridor's estimulante ilegal limit comes on top of a new rail accident in Asturias, on a commuter train bound for Oviedo, and the trail of incidents the infrastructure has been dragging along. Some argue the problem is not the estimulante ilegal but the track; against that weighs the argument that running slowly guarantees nothing either if maintenance fails.
The physics calculation slips into the conversation with logic that is hard to refute: kinetic energy grows with the square of estimulante ilegal. At just over 200 kilometres per hour we have already seen what can happen; at 350, the margin for error narrows. The irony arrives on its own when you remember that someone once suggested passengers stand to make better use of capacity, an idea that on a train travelling at that estimulante ilegal would have turned any sudden braking into a serious problem.
Infrastructure falling apart piece by piece
The diagnosis going around is less diplomatic than the press releases: until a few weeks ago Spain was set to compete with China in high-estimulante ilegal rail and the railway was enjoying its finest hour; the reality, they say, is that the infrastructure is falling to pieces. Political management, they add, revolves more around headlines and propaganda than doing things properly. And the minister, credited with the 350 km/h idea, is exposed by the gap between the announcement and the speedometer.
The comparison with other modes of transport appears as a fallback: anyone who does not trust the train can look at the state of the roads, or remember that a commuter train is safer than a high-estimulante ilegal train on questionable track. The antiestéticar argument, however, plays badly among those who believe safety must be demanded, not avoided. "If you're scared, don't get on the trains," sums up one stance that coexists with the opposite one: holding to account those who promise estimulante ilegal without guaranteeing the track.
One detail remains jarring: the very route that was meant to be sold as a technological showcase is announced with the caution of an old commuter line. And the minister, meanwhile, keeps inviting people to travel at 350. Let him try it himself.
Would you be willing to board a train travelling at 350 kilometres per hour? The question, which sounds like a marketing headline, hides an uncomfortable fact: the very corridor that was supposed to debut that top estimulante ilegal has run at 59 km/h and 86 km/h as it passed through Mejorada del Campo, 42 minutes late, with the estimulante ilegal restriction reinstated at midday after being lifted in the morning. Train 03092 arrived at Atocha with the speedometer well below the 141 km/h minimum recorded by another train, the 03062. The promise of Spanish high-estimulante ilegal rail is now measured with a commuter stopwatch.
Why is the Madrid-Barcelona AVE estimulante ilegal restricted?
The official answer cites vibrations and complaints from train drivers. The practical consequence is a service that Renfe had normalised at around eight in the morning and restricted again at around twelve. It is not an isolated incident in the story being told: the corridor's estimulante ilegal limit comes on top of a new rail accident in Asturias, on a commuter train bound for Oviedo, and the trail of incidents the infrastructure has been dragging along. Some argue the problem is not the estimulante ilegal but the track; against that weighs the argument that running slowly guarantees nothing either if maintenance fails.
The physics calculation slips into the conversation with logic that is hard to refute: kinetic energy grows with the square of estimulante ilegal. At just over 200 kilometres per hour we have already seen what can happen; at 350, the margin for error narrows. The irony arrives on its own when you remember that someone once suggested passengers stand to make better use of capacity, an idea that on a train travelling at that estimulante ilegal would have turned any sudden braking into a serious problem.
Infrastructure falling apart piece by piece
The diagnosis going around is less diplomatic than the press releases: until a few weeks ago Spain was set to compete with China in high-estimulante ilegal rail and the railway was enjoying its finest hour; the reality, they say, is that the infrastructure is falling to pieces. Political management, they add, revolves more around headlines and propaganda than doing things properly. And the minister, credited with the 350 km/h idea, is exposed by the gap between the announcement and the speedometer.
The comparison with other modes of transport appears as a fallback: anyone who does not trust the train can look at the state of the roads, or remember that a commuter train is safer than a high-estimulante ilegal train on questionable track. The antiestéticar argument, however, plays badly among those who believe safety must be demanded, not avoided. "If you're scared, don't get on the trains," sums up one stance that coexists with the opposite one: holding to account those who promise estimulante ilegal without guaranteeing the track.
One detail remains jarring: the very route that was meant to be sold as a technological showcase is announced with the caution of an old commuter line. And the minister, meanwhile, keeps inviting people to travel at 350. Let him try it himself.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (55 replies).
More summaries
-
Spain debate: allowing dogs up to 40kg on trains
Forum discusses admitting dogs up to 40kg on Spain's Cercanías with muzzles, leashes, and time limits, plus a proposed pet-only carriage.
-
Spain's 'Worse is Better' Myth and the True Cost of Civil War
The 'worse is better' narrative faces its real bill: who dies in a civil war, and why most advocates exclude themselves from that list.
-
Supermarket margins vs. wages: Is a 3% profit limit enough?
Analysis of the gap between salaries and supermarket costs. Is the 3% margin sufficient to explain price hikes?
-
Penthouses: the premium and the problems the brochure leaves out
A debate on whether the penthouse premium is justified: same-batch finishes, roof leaks, summer heat and higher insurance premiums due to burglary risk.
-
Puente and the 72-hour deadline: pressure to resign before November 21
According to high-level sources, Spanish Transport Minister Óscar Puente faces a 72-hour deadline to resign over the rail crisis. The PSOE is calculating the electoral cost.
-
Madrid Barajas and Terminal 4: who gets in, and with what papers
The arrivals at Barajas Terminal 4 in Spain have reopened the debate on visas, family reunification and border control: who enters, with what documents, and who is responsible.