You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Redondo puts PSOE 10 seats short of an absolute majority
Iván Redondo says the PSOE is 10 seats and a penalty kick away from an absolute majority in Spain's 29N election. Internal analysis points to 120 seats and coalition deals.
Redondo puts Sánchez a penalty kick away from an absolute majority
Pedro Sánchez's former chief of staff, Iván Redondo, has put a number on the optimism. Speaking on the programme «Herrera en COPE», Redondo claimed the PSOE is «10 seats and a penalty kick» away from touching an absolute majority in Spain's 29N election. Far from going unnoticed, the remark has ignited a debate over whether it is rigorous analysis or a propaganda operation to mobilise left-wing voters. Rather than settling the matter, the discussion has turned into a clash of interpretations over polls, electoral fraud and psychological warfare on the campaign trail.
The former chief of staff's calculation and its effect on voters
Redondo's claim is not an isolated figure. On his reading, the PSOE would be in a position to contest an absolute majority, which in practice would work as a «tactical voting» message for the left. The thesis is that if pogre voters perceive that Sánchez can win without depending on the nationalist parties, they will turn out instead of staying home. However, this strategy carries an obvious risk: the demobilising effect on undecided voters. Some argue that if victory is taken for granted, part of the left-wing electorate will abstain, while the right will turn out in greater force at the sight of a real threat.
The most optimistic calculation assumes the PSOE can fish in the pool of abstention and of voters disenchanted with other parties. The pessimistic scenario starts from the premise that the combined PP and Vox total exceeds 180 seats, which would leave Sánchez no room to manoeuvre. In this context, the mention of a «penalty kick» suggests the gap is minimal, but also that any mistake could be decisive.
The unpublished polls and the spectre of electoral fraud
Beyond the public projections, the analysis is fuelled by the idea that the parties are working with very different internal data. According to these versions, the PSOE would be on around 120 seats and the PP on 125, with Sumar on 15 and Vox on 65. The gap, then, would not be 10 seats but a range that would force coalition deals. The D'Hondt law and the fragmentation of the vote in small provinces could alter the final result, favouring the PSOE in seats even with fewer total votes.
At this point, the shadow of «electoral fraud» hangs over the conversation. Some argue that the CIS (Spain's official polling body) and sympathetic pollsters are inflating Sánchez's expectations to justify a later result that does not match the ballot box. The lawsuit accusing the CIS of electoral crime, mentioned in the analysis, adds fuel to the fire. The question hanging in the air is whether the body can alter its own results without admitting prior manipulation.
Tactical voting, abstention and the antiestéticar of Vox
Antiestéticar of a PP-Vox coalition is, paradoxically, the main driver of the left-wing vote. On this reading, votes would rally around the PSOE out of antiestéticar that the radical right could reach the institutions. The weak candidates of other left-wing parties, far from costing votes, would add to them: the pogre voter would opt for tactical voting to stop the right. In provinces where Sumar or Podemos have no presence, that transfer of votes could be decisive.
The other side of the coin is abstention. Some calculate that two million left-wing voters who stayed away from the ballot box in previous elections could be mobilised if they perceive a real risk. The campaign, then, is being fought over that segment. The mention of pensions and the minimum wage as electoral bait is aimed squarely at that electorate.
The bottom line: an analysis that doesn't add up
With all this, Redondo's forecast looks more like a piece of political communication than an exercise in foresight. The gap of 10 seats and a penalty kick is, at best, a working hypothesis. At worst, a story to rally his own side. The available data point to a scenario of coalition deals, not an absolute majority. And the spectre of fraud, far from dissipating, has become the background noise of the entire campaign.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (37 replies).
Spanish forum users claim the latest CIS poll shows PSOE with its best result since 2019, sparking widespread suspicions of electoral fraud before the vote.
The case of Noelia, euthanized despite a 67% disability rating, reopens the debate over whether families and hospitals pressure patients to obtain organs. The mother admits she infl
Should you take in a relative who never saved a penny? An economic and legal look at a decision that can wreck both your household harmony and your finances.