Gold Flat for Years While Bitcoin Soars 46x
With gold stuck at $1,290 and Bitcoin multiplying 46 times in two years, the precious metal is losing its safe-haven narrative. The debate over store of value...
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Gold Flat for Years While Bitcoin Soars 46x
With gold stuck around $1,290 and Bitcoin correcting from $20,000 to $10,200 in just two weeks, the uncomfortable question hovering over every investment conversation is: why isn't the metal that has served as money for thousands of years taking off? The answer, judging by the numbers, is not flattering to gold's defenders. Bitcoin multiplied its price by 46 in two years. Silver, meanwhile, remained anchored to early 2013 levels. The gap between narrative and price has become unsustainable.
Bitcoin Ate Gold's Narrative
For years, the thesis of gold as a safe haven against fiat currency was patiently upheld, almost religiously. The problem arose when an asset with no centuries of history behind it—a handful of lines of code, a blockchain—began to do what the metal promised but failed to deliver. One family sold all their possessions to buy Bitcoin when it was around $4,000; today it exceeds $15,000. The vertigo is the news.
The irony is that gold does retain its value, its defenders say. The nuance matters: retaining is not multiplying. And in a market addicted to rapid appreciation, retaining is boring. Silver, the other major safe-haven metal, had been stuck in its range since 2013. Nothing to celebrate.
Why Measuring Gold in Dollars Doesn't Work
There's a technical debate that often goes unnoticed but explains a good part of the disillusionment. Valuing gold in a fiat currency isn't measuring it: it's comparing it to something that is devalued by design. That's why many analysts resort to ratios—gold versus silver, versus oil, versus stocks—to gauge whether the metal is expensive or cheap. These are comparisons, not thermometers. The distinction isn't academic: it defines whether one believes gold is "rising" or money is "falling."
Hence one of the most repeated phrases: it's not so much that gold can multiply by ten, but that fiat currencies could divide by ten in the coming years. It's two sides of the same coin, never a better saying.
Is Bitcoin Gold 2.0 or Nasdaq 2.0?
This is where the analysis splits. One current holds that Bitcoin is an incipient technology with a ceiling—if it absorbed all the money currently in gold, each unit would be worth $350,000, as there are 350 ounces of gold for every Bitcoin. Another warns that it hasn't yet been tested in a serious crisis and that its volatility disqualifies it as a store of value. The fall from $20,000 to $10,200, and Ripple's from $3.25 to $0.95, gave ammunition to the latter.
It was precisely summarized by one of the most cited interventions: it's unknown whether Bitcoin is Gold 2.0 or Nasdaq 2.0. The difference is not minor. As a reserve, it disappoints; as a technological asset, it's something else.
Physical or Paper: The Debate That Never Ends
Among the metal's proponents, there's a division that cuts across the entire sector: physical gold versus its derivatives. An ETF, a future, or a mining company can rise with the metal and still go bankrupt due to the underlying asset. The example circulating—forced, but illustrative—is that of a hotel in a country suffering a coup d'état: the asset is still there, but one can no longer operate it.
The most aggressive investment branch took refuge in silver miners to add "excitement" to the matter. With mid-tier producers at laughably low prices, some saw the situation as an opportunity.
What If South Africa Descends into Chaos
The question hangs over the gold market for a weighty reason: South Africa represents 15% of the world's ounces and over 30% of known reserves. A nationalization of mines would cut global production by 30% to 50%, according to the most repeated calculations. The impact on gold would be notable, but even greater on platinum, of which the country extracts 80% globally, in addition to chromium and palladium.
The price of gold isn't moving. Silver isn't moving. Bitcoin moves too much. And amidst this disorder, the conversation always ends at the same stalemate: some defend the metal as life insurance, others see it as a drag with thousands of years of marketing. No one has yet managed to settle which of the two is looking at the correct money.
With gold stuck around $1,290 and Bitcoin correcting from $20,000 to $10,200 in just two weeks, the uncomfortable question hovering over every investment conversation is: why isn't the metal that has served as money for thousands of years taking off? The answer, judging by the numbers, is not flattering to gold's defenders. Bitcoin multiplied its price by 46 in two years. Silver, meanwhile, remained anchored to early 2013 levels. The gap between narrative and price has become unsustainable.
Bitcoin Ate Gold's Narrative
For years, the thesis of gold as a safe haven against fiat currency was patiently upheld, almost religiously. The problem arose when an asset with no centuries of history behind it—a handful of lines of code, a blockchain—began to do what the metal promised but failed to deliver. One family sold all their possessions to buy Bitcoin when it was around $4,000; today it exceeds $15,000. The vertigo is the news.
The irony is that gold does retain its value, its defenders say. The nuance matters: retaining is not multiplying. And in a market addicted to rapid appreciation, retaining is boring. Silver, the other major safe-haven metal, had been stuck in its range since 2013. Nothing to celebrate.
Why Measuring Gold in Dollars Doesn't Work
There's a technical debate that often goes unnoticed but explains a good part of the disillusionment. Valuing gold in a fiat currency isn't measuring it: it's comparing it to something that is devalued by design. That's why many analysts resort to ratios—gold versus silver, versus oil, versus stocks—to gauge whether the metal is expensive or cheap. These are comparisons, not thermometers. The distinction isn't academic: it defines whether one believes gold is "rising" or money is "falling."
Hence one of the most repeated phrases: it's not so much that gold can multiply by ten, but that fiat currencies could divide by ten in the coming years. It's two sides of the same coin, never a better saying.
Is Bitcoin Gold 2.0 or Nasdaq 2.0?
This is where the analysis splits. One current holds that Bitcoin is an incipient technology with a ceiling—if it absorbed all the money currently in gold, each unit would be worth $350,000, as there are 350 ounces of gold for every Bitcoin. Another warns that it hasn't yet been tested in a serious crisis and that its volatility disqualifies it as a store of value. The fall from $20,000 to $10,200, and Ripple's from $3.25 to $0.95, gave ammunition to the latter.
It was precisely summarized by one of the most cited interventions: it's unknown whether Bitcoin is Gold 2.0 or Nasdaq 2.0. The difference is not minor. As a reserve, it disappoints; as a technological asset, it's something else.
Physical or Paper: The Debate That Never Ends
Among the metal's proponents, there's a division that cuts across the entire sector: physical gold versus its derivatives. An ETF, a future, or a mining company can rise with the metal and still go bankrupt due to the underlying asset. The example circulating—forced, but illustrative—is that of a hotel in a country suffering a coup d'état: the asset is still there, but one can no longer operate it.
The most aggressive investment branch took refuge in silver miners to add "excitement" to the matter. With mid-tier producers at laughably low prices, some saw the situation as an opportunity.
What If South Africa Descends into Chaos
The question hangs over the gold market for a weighty reason: South Africa represents 15% of the world's ounces and over 30% of known reserves. A nationalization of mines would cut global production by 30% to 50%, according to the most repeated calculations. The impact on gold would be notable, but even greater on platinum, of which the country extracts 80% globally, in addition to chromium and palladium.
The price of gold isn't moving. Silver isn't moving. Bitcoin moves too much. And amidst this disorder, the conversation always ends at the same stalemate: some defend the metal as life insurance, others see it as a drag with thousands of years of marketing. No one has yet managed to settle which of the two is looking at the correct money.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (1485 replies).
More summaries
-
Gold Hits $4,000 After Doubling, Texas Accepts It as Currency
Gold jumps from $1,450 to $4,106 per ounce, correcting to $4,000, as Texas, Florida, and Missouri recognize it as legal tender.
-
Gold stuck at 0.382 as bitcoin takes the spotlight
Gold stuck at 0.382 and unable to recover while bitcoin hits 6.000 dollars; thresholds at 1.250 and 1.050 set the scene.
-
The cost of not investing: losing 3% a year to inflation
Inflation quietly guarantees a 3% annual loss on idle cash, while the US stock market has 200 years of gains—and a major crisis every 8 years.
-
Extra virgin olive oil falls to €6.35 a litre at Mercadona
Extra virgin olive oil is now €6.35/litre at Mercadona, down from €6.75 months ago, while the origin price of picual is €4.143/kg
-
BIG offers 4% TAE on 6-month deposit with Spanish IBAN and Portuguese FGD
BIG launched a 4% TAE six-month and 3.5% three-month deposit in May 2023 with Spanish IBAN and Portuguese FGD, but later cut rates and had opening delays.
-
Spot-price coins: the seller whose paper trail didn't add up
He offered quarter-ounce gold coins at spot price and racked up undelivered orders. Buyers cross-checked his details and several got their money back.