Frente Obrero's territorial shift fuels controversy in Spain
Vaquero admits the change of position on Ceuta, Melilla and Western Sahara. Electoral opportunism or Leninist consistency?
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Frente Obrero and the suspicion of territorial opportunism
You don't see a party invoking Lenin to defend the Spanishness of Ceuta and Melilla every day. Frente Obrero (FO) has gone from being a curiosity on the radical left to the centre of a controversy mixing electoral opportunism, Marxist reinterpretation and a healthy dose of conspiratorial paranoia.
From orthodoxy to U-turn, the Vaquero case
The party's own leader, Vaquero, has admitted that his positions on several territorial issues have changed. Videos from four or five years ago show him at the opposite end of his current discourse. The harshest criticism holds that he has given in to electoralism: FO would have silenced the historical cause of Western Sahara to embrace a sovereigntist discourse on Ceuta and Melilla that fits better with the current political climate. The comparison with VOX and the Alvise phenomenon is unavoidable: they all work with the same wicker of the opportunistic U-turn.
Lenin, misunderstood or accommodating?
The defenders see no contradiction whatsoever. They claim Lenin is never wrong, only misinterpreted, and that FO has always defended the sovereignty of the entire Spanish territory. The accusation that the CNI (Spain's intelligence service) is behind the criticism — that it "releases its dobermans", in the supporters' jargon — completes a cocktail where conspiracy and sarcasm go hand in hand.
A ghost tweet and scepticism
The curious thing is that the origin of the controversy is a tweet from six years ago that nobody can find anymore, but which according to some contradicted the current position. The phrase that sums up the scepticism: "These are my principles, but if you don't give me votes, I have others." A verdict, they say, applicable to far too many political projects.
The question left hanging: can a party with Leninist roots defend positions it would once have branded heresy without losing its ideological compass?
You don't see a party invoking Lenin to defend the Spanishness of Ceuta and Melilla every day. Frente Obrero (FO) has gone from being a curiosity on the radical left to the centre of a controversy mixing electoral opportunism, Marxist reinterpretation and a healthy dose of conspiratorial paranoia.
From orthodoxy to U-turn, the Vaquero case
The party's own leader, Vaquero, has admitted that his positions on several territorial issues have changed. Videos from four or five years ago show him at the opposite end of his current discourse. The harshest criticism holds that he has given in to electoralism: FO would have silenced the historical cause of Western Sahara to embrace a sovereigntist discourse on Ceuta and Melilla that fits better with the current political climate. The comparison with VOX and the Alvise phenomenon is unavoidable: they all work with the same wicker of the opportunistic U-turn.
Lenin, misunderstood or accommodating?
The defenders see no contradiction whatsoever. They claim Lenin is never wrong, only misinterpreted, and that FO has always defended the sovereignty of the entire Spanish territory. The accusation that the CNI (Spain's intelligence service) is behind the criticism — that it "releases its dobermans", in the supporters' jargon — completes a cocktail where conspiracy and sarcasm go hand in hand.
A ghost tweet and scepticism
The curious thing is that the origin of the controversy is a tweet from six years ago that nobody can find anymore, but which according to some contradicted the current position. The phrase that sums up the scepticism: "These are my principles, but if you don't give me votes, I have others." A verdict, they say, applicable to far too many political projects.
The question left hanging: can a party with Leninist roots defend positions it would once have branded heresy without losing its ideological compass?
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (12 replies).
More summaries
-
Ceuta and Melilla's defense gap against Morocco
The debate over whether NATO would defend Ceuta and Melilla in a hypothetical war with Morocco: no Article 5 guarantee exists, and the reliable ally is smiling.
-
Ceuta and Melilla: the theory of a hybrid takeover through healthcare
The theory circulating: Ceuta and Melilla would not fall to a military invasion but to a healthcare collapse forcing evacuation
-
Ceuta and Melilla: An Annual €1.8 Billion Cost to the State
Ceuta and Melilla carry an unfavorable fiscal balance of €823 million and a total cost of €1.8 billion per year. We analyze the bill, figure by figure.
-
Orania: the Afrikaner community running itself in South Africa
Orania: 2,500-3,000 Afrikaners run a private community bought in 1991. They pay taxes, according to the material. The debate over whether the third world is…
-
Tourist detains engineer over watch theft in Barcelona's Raval
A viral video shows a tourist detaining an engineer accused of stealing his watch in Barcelona's Raval. The debate over security and police response reopens.
-
Ceuta: distraction or real crisis after Spain's wildfires
The mass crossing into Ceuta coinciding with the end of Spain's wildfires has fuelled the smoke screen theory. Calculated distraction or mere coincidence?