Ceuta and Melilla: An Annual €1.8 Billion Cost to the State

##
The Fiscal Balance of Ceuta and Melilla: €1.8 Billion Annually

How much does it cost for Ceuta and Melilla to remain Spanish? The two autonomous cities carry an unfavorable fiscal balance of €823 million, and when transfers are added up, the annual cost to the entire State approaches €1.8 billion. This is the figure placed on the table when someone decides to examine this matter without a patriotic instruction manual. Maintaining a border in the Strait costs money. The question is how much, who pays for it, and if it makes sense.

The Deficit Sustained by the State

The starting point is an unfavorable fiscal balance of €823 million attributed to the two autonomous cities: what the State collects from them minus what it spends on them. Local GDPs are modest and heavily reliant on the public sector, cross-border trade, and the special economic regime. It is no accounting secret: it is the financing model designed to keep them operational.

The discussion begins there, and immediately splits into two camps. Some argue that no region with such an imbalance could withstand a cold analysis without being asked for explanations. Others respond that the fiscal balance of a post does not measure up like a bank branch, because what is at stake is not profitability, but sovereignty and geopolitical position.

Aid to Segarro: The Missing Line Item

to the fiscal deficit is added, according to critical reading, another layer: the credits and aid that Spain channels toward Segarro. During 2025, the State would have allocated about €1 billion in credits for infrastructure, to which nearly €100 million in community aid would be added. The interpretation of this influx of money varies depending on who is counting it: for some, it is strategic cooperation that buys stability in the neighborhood; for others, it is the price paid to keep Rabat from straining the border.

That is the crux of the matter. If these amounts are considered part of the cost of maintaining Spanish presence, the bill goes up. If they are viewed as normal foreign policy, then the comparison with Ceuta and Melilla loses its punch.

The Strait Argument

Against the numbers, strategic value emerges. Ceuta and Melilla control the northern flank of the Strait of Gibraltar, one of the world's busiest maritime passages. Those who defend this enclave recall that fuel traffic has already shifted toward Gibraltar, with tax advantages the Spanish cities cannot replicate, and that much of Ceuta's economic asphyxia is a political decision, not a geographical inevitability. In that logic, the territory is worth more than its cost.

The historical argument also weighs heavily: they are not colonies, but places of sovereignty predating the configuration of other provinces. As a curiosity, the Second Republic considered offering territorial advantages in exchange for foreign neutrality in 1937, within the so-called Schulmeister Operation—an episode brought up when the debate heats up.

What if the Problem Isn't Ceuta?

The other twist is comparison. If public spending is concerning, Ceuta and Melilla are a small part of the picture: RTVE and the autonomous bodies would total €2.5 billion; international cooperation, €4.5 billion; and military support for Ukraine has reached €17 billion. With these figures in hand, the question is why the €823 million fiscal balance of two cities with less than 200,000 inhabitants generates more controversy than ten times larger items.

The complete calculation, item by item, admits many variations and none adds up perfectly. What no one disputes is that maintaining territory in the Strait comes with a price that someone pays every year.

---

In the end, the Spanish identity of Ceuta and Melilla is like heating in January: extremely expensive, indispensable for those who embrace it, and there is always someone convinced that they could turn it off for a while to save money. Then the bill arrives, and it is no longer so clear which room needed heating.