Fetuccini: Plug Power from $9 to $67 without gross profit

Fetuccini claims Plug Power, from $9 to $67, has had no gross profit since 2010; the thread reviews deals with Renault, Airbus, and Walmart

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Fetuccini: Plug Power from $9 to $67 without gross profit
Fetuccini: Plug Power from $9 to $67 without gross profit

Plug Power is proof that in the stock market, the balance sheet doesn't always rule. The hydrogen fuel cell company went from trading around $9 to over $67, and it did so with a set of accounts that a textbook investor would throw straight in the bin. According to Fetuccini, the company hasn't had a single dollar of gross profit since at least 2010. Translation: it would make more money sitting in the sun.

And yet, there it is. The stock rose more than 7% in a single session, then 8%, then 12%, then 15%. The pattern repeats: contract, spike, contract, spike. The obvious question is whether this is a company or a promise with a ticker.

What Plug Power is and why it's soaring

Plug Power makes hydrogen fuel cells and electrolyzers. Its initial sales were aimed at forklifts, a niche that's not segarro but real. From there, the company has been signing agreements that justify—or at least accompany—each leg of the rise.

The list of announcements is long: a $172 million order from a Fortune 100 customer, a deal with Walmart, the development of three hydrogen vans with Renault, a study with Airbus to decarbonize air transport, the construction of the world's largest electrolyzer factory in Queensland alongside Fortescue, and a commercial agreement with Lhyfe to develop green hydrogen plants in Europe. Plus, a new megafactory costing $125 million and 377 employees.

Each headline pushed the stock price. 2020 results beat expectations and the company raised its targets for 2021 and 2024. In a stock like this, that's worth as much as profit itself.

The balance sheet that doesn't match the stock price

Here's the problem. Fetuccini claims Plug Power hasn't generated gross profit for over a decade. According to one participant, it survives, like much of the low-cap tech on the Nasdaq and OTC market, through equity raises, public subsidies, and private credit via high-interest bonds.

It's the classic sector model, according to that same forum member: if you look for healthy tech companies, they won't hit it big, but they won't ruin you either. If you're looking for the big win, you accept that the company can lose money every quarter and still multiply. The reference cited is PLUG precisely: losing money every quarter, it still managed a 1000% gain.

The question left hanging is whether the market is valuing the future or just the story. That doubt isn't resolved by a balance sheet.

Hydrogen vs. lithium: not the same

One of the most common confusions is lumping hydrogen and lithium together. They're not. Hydrogen isn't part of the battery: it feeds the fuel cell, which generates energy, and that energy is then stored in lithium or other batteries to distribute to the motor and vehicle systems.

The theoretical advantage is refueling: with hydrogen stations, refueling would be like filling up with gasoline, without the waiting times of a plug. The disadvantage is that this infrastructure doesn't exist. Hydrogen is almost infinite, but the network to distribute it is not.

The debate is not minor. It determines whether Plug Power is a future energy company or a lab bet with an expiration date.

Real returns and risk

The numbers on the optimistic side are dizzying: 50% return in the last month, 150% for the year, and 2500% in five years. Anyone who got in at $9 and held on now has a margin of safety that lets them sleep soundly.

Therein lies the detail that separates the investor from the gambler. The stock has passed through $40, $41, $42, $65, and $67 at different stages, and each of those levels has been presented as either a broken resistance or a dangerous ceiling. Volatility is extreme. Some sold at $67 and don't plan to return. Some doubled down in a drop because they know the company professionally.

The most repeated advice, even among the convinced, is not to buy at highs. It sounds obvious. Almost no one trinc it.

To diversify or not to diversify

The hydrogen sector isn't just Plug Power. Ballard Power, SFC Energy, and Bloom Energy appear as alternatives within the same theme. The strategy advocated is to spread capital across several stocks, assigning more weight to the largest and most established companies.

Some portfolios reach 50 stocks, with names like Indutrade, Shake Shack, Dollar General, Facebook, Galaxy Resources, Fulgent Genetics, or Restaurant Brands.

What could happen now

Plug Power has shown it can rise sharply without needing to report profits. It has also shown it can correct just as easily. Contracts keep coming and the market keeps rewarding them, but the balance sheet hasn't changed.

The hydrogen bet is long-term. The problem is that the market doesn't always have patience, and the company hasn't yet given accounting reasons to have it. Meanwhile, the stock will keep doing what it does best: move.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (229 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back