Cinema 2025-2026: Recommendations That Survive the Grey Filter

A forum discussion yields a short list of 2025-2026 film recommendations, a thesis on the "grey filter," and an open debate regarding contemporary cinema.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Cinema 2025-2026: The List That Survives the Grey Filter

"Finding a good film from 2025-2026 is no longer about going to the cinema: it's fieldwork," summarizes one forum user. Cross-recommendations result in a short selection and a thesis on the digital finish: the films look dark and grey.
The complaint is not only about scripts; it is also about tonalidad.

Which 2025-2026 films survive?

The list of recommended titles is heterogeneous, ranging from the martial to the taurine (bullfighting). Included are «La asistenta», «Máquina de guerra», «Osiris», «Amenaza en el aire», «El abismo secreto», «Sisu: camino a la venganza», «The amateur», «Un día fuera de control», «El botín 2026» and «28 años después: el templo de los huesos». In the documentary genre, «Tardes de soledad» about the bullfighting world appears, and some add «Bugonia», despite acknowledging it starts off sounding like nonsense and is saved by the ending.

However, enthusiasm comes with caveats. According to one forum user, one of the most discussed recommendations is described as a recruitment tape for rangers that "delivers on its promise and looks very good," although it leaves the feeling of mimicking the ending of a previous production about marines. Another is bluntly described, by another participant, as a low-budget Predator: it entertains but becomes forgettable within four or five days.

There is a list that opens and closes in the same message: the list of 2025-2026 titles that «are worth it,» is empty. It summarizes a critical sentiment present in the thread.

Why does contemporary cinema look so dark and grey?

One forum user holds a technical thesis: the films are shot in front of a chroma key, and the backgrounds are added digitally afterward. To disguise differences between foreground and background, the images are edited, resulting in dark, greyish, somber tones. The person holding this view has not seen cinema from the last seven or ten years and maintains they dislike its tonalidad.

The thesis is held by a single user and is not further detailed in the thread. The complaint about tonalidad appears, but there is no common diagnosis regarding its causes.

The titles that fall short

One forum user dismisses «Weapons» as a product that doesn't decide whether it is comedy or pavor and fails at both fronts. «Sirat» is described as unbearable. «Nosferatu» is deemed the worst film of its director's career to date. The list of disappointments is completed with «Sinners» and the latest from two major auteur names, without further nuance.

Is it still worth going to the cinema?

Some say they haven't set foot in a theater since 2010 and ask, half-jokingly, if they have missed something. Others reply that the problem is not the supply but the demand: that people are already accepting any sort of garbage. Another user points out that what is being done now is disliked by veterans, newcomers, and those who make it.

Where does the analysis stall

The thread reaches no single conclusion. Faced with those who recommend specific titles, there are those who argue that contemporary cinema is garbage, and those who haven't seen films from the last seven or ten years. The lists, criticisms, and disagreements remain open.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (132 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back