Brave: fewer ads, less spying?
Brave blocks ads but sites like Libertad Digital lock you out. Is it more private than Chrome? A look at performance and alternatives: is it worth it?
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Brave, the browser that promises less advertising and more privacy: reality or mirage?
A user wonders whether Brave spies less than Google. Six years on, the browser still sparks the same debate. Experience shows it blocks ads effectively, especially on mobile, where Chrome has become unbearable. But websites fight back: "Disable your ad blocker" is the new annoying banner that appears on outlets like Libertad Digital.
Performance: endless tabs without crashing
Anyone who has tried it with multiple tabs says it handles the load well. Advertising disappears completely, something Opera stopped doing over time. The problem is that some sites detect the blocking and won't let you browse without disabling it. For many, the solution is to use Firefox with uBlock on the PC and Brave on mobile, or even combine Chrome without a blocker for those sites.
The big question: does it spy or not?
While some argue that Brave is as intrusive as Chrome, others point out that its creator is the same as Firefox's, which inspires more trust. The truth is that Brave is based on Chromium, Google's engine, which inevitably raises suspicions. For the more paranoid, there's Brave Origin, an AI-free version for Linux that promises pristine browsing.
Alternatives and DIY solutions
On Android, those with a rooted phone can turn to AdAway. Others prefer Blokada or NetGuard, which can be downloaded from F-Droid. Kiwi Browser also comes up as an alternative, though many go back to Brave. The consensus: any browser other than Chrome improves the mobile experience, but privacy remains a half-lost battle.
Given all this, the decision is a personal one. Brave blocks ads without hesitation, but convenience comes at a price: websites that shut the door on you. And the shadow of Chromium always looms.
Related discussions in the forum
A user wonders whether Brave spies less than Google. Six years on, the browser still sparks the same debate. Experience shows it blocks ads effectively, especially on mobile, where Chrome has become unbearable. But websites fight back: "Disable your ad blocker" is the new annoying banner that appears on outlets like Libertad Digital.
Performance: endless tabs without crashing
Anyone who has tried it with multiple tabs says it handles the load well. Advertising disappears completely, something Opera stopped doing over time. The problem is that some sites detect the blocking and won't let you browse without disabling it. For many, the solution is to use Firefox with uBlock on the PC and Brave on mobile, or even combine Chrome without a blocker for those sites.
The big question: does it spy or not?
While some argue that Brave is as intrusive as Chrome, others point out that its creator is the same as Firefox's, which inspires more trust. The truth is that Brave is based on Chromium, Google's engine, which inevitably raises suspicions. For the more paranoid, there's Brave Origin, an AI-free version for Linux that promises pristine browsing.
Alternatives and DIY solutions
On Android, those with a rooted phone can turn to AdAway. Others prefer Blokada or NetGuard, which can be downloaded from F-Droid. Kiwi Browser also comes up as an alternative, though many go back to Brave. The consensus: any browser other than Chrome improves the mobile experience, but privacy remains a half-lost battle.
Given all this, the decision is a personal one. Brave blocks ads without hesitation, but convenience comes at a price: websites that shut the door on you. And the shadow of Chromium always looms.
Related discussions in the forum
- What are the best cookies to have with your morning coffee? · 85 replies
- Today is American cheese day · 53 replies
- Which toca do you recommend? · 38 replies
- making sparkling water · 15 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (19 replies).
More summaries
-
Brave, Firefox and the Chrome fatigue: which browser do users choose?
Brave, Firefox, Opera or Edge: the browser debate reveals growing fatigue with Chrome and a search for privacy. An analysis of the options and trends.
-
The PC is not dead, but mandatory apps are killing it
As websites fail and mobile apps become essential, the PC loses ground to smartphones despite its superior power and privacy.
-
Stuck Faucet Eccentric: Limescale, Hemp, and DIY Fixes
A faucet eccentric stuck by decades of limescale and hemp. Discover which remedies work (vinegar, torch, wrench) and when to call a plumber.
-
Childhood myopia debate: screens, outdoor time and lifestyle
Forum users debate whether childhood myopia is caused by screens, lack of outdoor time or dim light. A scene with a baby and a phone opens the thread.
-
Basic or acoustic plasterboard: the extra cost of 10 to 40 euros per m²
A basic plasterboard partition costs around 10 euros per square metre; the thermoacoustic version can reach 40. The board doesn't insulate: it's the wool inside that does.
-
Looking for a cheaper mobile plan?
Searching for the cheapest mobile line? We compare the best low-cost, prepaid and zero-fee plans based on our users' experience. Save to the max!