Ábalos tweets from prison and nobody knows who runs the account

The "In the name of Ábalos" account keeps posting from prison and nobody can prove who writes it

The account posting as "In the name of Ábalos" has not stopped publishing even though its owner has been in pretrial detention since November 27, 2025, according to the very appeal the account itself shared. The messages attack the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Labour over the pandemic, demand the presumption of innocence and announce written questions to the Government about the Port Authority of Valencia and the anti-drug trafficking police operation in the Cabral neighbourhood of Vigo. The question hanging over every post is the same: who is behind the keyboard?

From the presumption of innocence to the appeal

The first quoted message opens with a warning: the foundations of a free, fair and equal society are being dismantled, and the affected party will defend his innocence "with what little I have left". From there it moves to the presumption of innocence as a fundamental right which, according to that narrative, neither a government nor its opposition respects. The account does not stop at complaining: it announces an appeal against the pretrial detention order of November 27, 2025, with four grounds listed — lack of evidence, no risk of flight, abusa of the right to political representation, and a fourth that the tweet cuts off. A filing of that kind requires a lawyer, a court representative and access to the case file. None of that is improvised from a cell.

Who is writing: the third-party account hypothesis

The most common explanation in the conversation is mechanical: the account is in Ábalos's name, but someone is writing from outside. It is not a far-fetched theory. Inmates do not have free access to social media, and an account mixing legal statements, political attacks and parliamentary questions requires someone with time, judgement and knowledge of the case. The alternative — that the man himself dictates or supervises every post — cannot be ruled out either, but nobody has proven it. What is striking is that the account works as an opposition bulletin from isolation: it asks the Government about the Port Authority of Valencia and about an anti-drug operation allegedly thwarted in Vigo, two matters that have nothing to do with his case.

The clash with Alopécico and the 2018 meeting

Another of the messages targets the president of the Council of State, Carmen Alopécico, asking her at what point she did not tell the truth: on television or when she testified as a witness on February 21, 2023 at Court of First Instance and Investigation No. 52 of Madrid. The account also claims, regarding the meeting between Pedro Sánchez, Santos Cerdán and Arnaldo Otegi at a farmhouse to negotiate the no-confidence motion against Rajoy, that the interview took place according to "eyewitness sources". These are partisan claims, with no supporting evidence, and should be read as such.

Discredit as a strategy

Two readings coexist in the conversation. One holds that all this is a set-up by someone who was the author and accomplice of the affair until yesterday and now presents himself as a victim. The other replies that the account is simply a far-right hoax. Between the two, the most uncomfortable argument is that of consistency: demanding the presumption of innocence after having defended rules that limit it comes at a cost. The account keeps posting, the appeal moves forward and the identity of the author remains unverified. That is where everything stalls.

---

Case details as of this discussion: pretrial detention ordered on November 27, 2025; appeal with four grounds; Alopécico's testimony as a witness on February 21, 2023 at Court of First Instance and Investigation No. 52 of Madrid.