PutinReReloaded
Madmaxista
A mí, lo que me molesta de ese señor, es que con su método se puedan detectar bichito de todas clases y colores, hepatitis A,B Y C, Citomegalovirus, sincitial respiratorio, papiloma humano, herpes bichito, etc, etc, etc... que se puedan aislar bacterias, como la de la tuberculosis o el helycobacter pilory, etc, etc, etc, que se use para detectar parásitos como la Leismania, que incluso se use para detectar infecciones en animales, que se use para medicina forense o para detectar anomalías genéticas y ¡oh, qué cosas! en lo ÚNICO que falla es en la detección del VIH... ME LO EXPLIQUEN[/SIZE] porque eso, sí que mosquea. O sirve para todos o no sirve para ninguno. ¿No te mosquea a ti eso?
Aquí te lo explica el mismísimo Nobel de bioquímica en un artículo del que es co-autor:
What Causes AIDS? - It's an open question.
Charles Thomas, Karen Mullis & Phillip Johnson,
Reason - 1994/06/01.
Most Americans believe they know what causes AIDS. For a decade, scientists, government officials, physicians, journalists, public-service ads, TV shows, and movies have told them that AIDS is caused by a retrovirus called HIV. This bichito supposedly infects and kills the "T-cells" of the immune system, leading to an inevitably fatal immune deficiency after an asymptomatic period that averages 10 years or so. Most Americans do not know--because there has been a virtual media blackout on the subject--about a longstanding scientific controversy over the cause of AIDS, a controversy that has become increasingly heated as the official theory's predictions have turned out to be wrong.
Leading biochemical scientists, including University of California at Berkeley retrovirus expert Peter Duesberg and Nobel Prize winner Walter Gilbert, have been warning for years that there is no proof that HIV causes AIDS. The warnings were met first with silence, then with ridicule and contempt. In 1990, for example, Nature published a rare response from the HIV establishment, as represented by Robin A. Weiss of the Institute of Cancer Research in London and Harold W. Jaffe of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Weiss and Jaffe compared the doubters to people who think that bad air causes malaria. "We have�been told," they wrote, "that the human immuno-deficiency bichito (HIV) originates from outer space, or as a genetically engineered bichito for germ warfare which was tested in prisoners and spread from them. Peter H. Duesberg's proposition that HIV is not the cause of AIDS at all is, to our minds, equally absurd." Viewers of ABC's 1993 Day One special on the cause of AIDS--almost the only occasion on which network television has covered the controversy--saw Robert Gallo, the leading exponent of the HIV theory, stomp away from the microphone in a rage when asked to respond to the views of Gilbert and Duesberg.
Such displays of rage and ridicule are familiar to those who question the HIV theory of AIDS. Ever since 1984, when Gallo announced the discovery of what the newspapers call "HIV, the bichito that causes AIDS," at a government press conference, the HIV theory has been the basis of all scientific work on AIDS. If the theory is mistaken, billions of dollars have been wasted--and immense harm has been done to persons who have tested positive for antibodies to HIV and therefore have been told to expect an early and painful death. The furious reactions to the suggestion that a colossal mistake may have been made are not surprising, given that the credibility of the biomedical establishment is at stake. It is time to think about the unthinkable, however, because there are at least three reasons for doubting the official theory that HIV causes AIDS.
sigue....
Charles Thomas, Karen Mullis & Phillip Johnson,
Reason - 1994/06/01.
Most Americans believe they know what causes AIDS. For a decade, scientists, government officials, physicians, journalists, public-service ads, TV shows, and movies have told them that AIDS is caused by a retrovirus called HIV. This bichito supposedly infects and kills the "T-cells" of the immune system, leading to an inevitably fatal immune deficiency after an asymptomatic period that averages 10 years or so. Most Americans do not know--because there has been a virtual media blackout on the subject--about a longstanding scientific controversy over the cause of AIDS, a controversy that has become increasingly heated as the official theory's predictions have turned out to be wrong.
Leading biochemical scientists, including University of California at Berkeley retrovirus expert Peter Duesberg and Nobel Prize winner Walter Gilbert, have been warning for years that there is no proof that HIV causes AIDS. The warnings were met first with silence, then with ridicule and contempt. In 1990, for example, Nature published a rare response from the HIV establishment, as represented by Robin A. Weiss of the Institute of Cancer Research in London and Harold W. Jaffe of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Weiss and Jaffe compared the doubters to people who think that bad air causes malaria. "We have�been told," they wrote, "that the human immuno-deficiency bichito (HIV) originates from outer space, or as a genetically engineered bichito for germ warfare which was tested in prisoners and spread from them. Peter H. Duesberg's proposition that HIV is not the cause of AIDS at all is, to our minds, equally absurd." Viewers of ABC's 1993 Day One special on the cause of AIDS--almost the only occasion on which network television has covered the controversy--saw Robert Gallo, the leading exponent of the HIV theory, stomp away from the microphone in a rage when asked to respond to the views of Gilbert and Duesberg.
Such displays of rage and ridicule are familiar to those who question the HIV theory of AIDS. Ever since 1984, when Gallo announced the discovery of what the newspapers call "HIV, the bichito that causes AIDS," at a government press conference, the HIV theory has been the basis of all scientific work on AIDS. If the theory is mistaken, billions of dollars have been wasted--and immense harm has been done to persons who have tested positive for antibodies to HIV and therefore have been told to expect an early and painful death. The furious reactions to the suggestion that a colossal mistake may have been made are not surprising, given that the credibility of the biomedical establishment is at stake. It is time to think about the unthinkable, however, because there are at least three reasons for doubting the official theory that HIV causes AIDS.
sigue....
No entiendes los argumentos, los rebates con apelaciones a la emoción
Estás discutiendo fuera de tu liga, lárgate ya.
Última edición: