Why is the global economy doing so badly despite record productivity?
We are more productive than ever, yet job insecurity keeps growing. We look at why the world economy seems to be drifting and what the structural problems are.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Why is the global economy doing so badly if we produce more than ever?
We are more productive than ever, and yet unemployment, job insecurity and taxes are hitting record levels. Pessimism has become realism. What is the structural flaw?
The productivity paradox
The disconnect between rising productivity and the deteriorating living conditions of the middle and working classes in the West is the big theme of the decade. While China and Southeast Asia are growing at rates that lift millions out of poverty, Europe and the United States are weighed down by a sense of unstoppable decline. Aggregate production figures are misleading: real GDP per capita does not translate into improvement for the majority. The problem is not ideological, but one of distribution and economic power dynamics.
Ageing and housing: the two battlegrounds
Population ageing is a key factor, but it does not explain everything: China is ageing too and still pushing forward. The difference lies in industrial policy and control of capital flows. In the West, the real estate bubble and financialization have turned housing into a speculative asset rather than a basic good. Inflation, fueled by unchecked money printing, hits fixed incomes while asset prices soar. Those who already had wealth win; those who did not, lose.
The mirage of global growth
Some analyses argue that the world economy as a whole is actually improving, especially in Africa and Asia. Famines have disappeared from the headlines, and millions of people have escaped extreme poverty. The problem, then, would be a local one for the West: a system that no longer offers social mobility, where the elevator is broken. The open question is whether that Western model is sustainable or whether the future looks more like that of the countries that have decided not to play by the same rules.
There is no single answer. But the thread to unravel lies in the gap between the macroeconomic narrative and the microeconomic reality. As long as aggregate indicators keep hiding inequality, discontent will only keep growing.
Related debates in the forum
We are more productive than ever, and yet unemployment, job insecurity and taxes are hitting record levels. Pessimism has become realism. What is the structural flaw?
The productivity paradox
The disconnect between rising productivity and the deteriorating living conditions of the middle and working classes in the West is the big theme of the decade. While China and Southeast Asia are growing at rates that lift millions out of poverty, Europe and the United States are weighed down by a sense of unstoppable decline. Aggregate production figures are misleading: real GDP per capita does not translate into improvement for the majority. The problem is not ideological, but one of distribution and economic power dynamics.
Ageing and housing: the two battlegrounds
Population ageing is a key factor, but it does not explain everything: China is ageing too and still pushing forward. The difference lies in industrial policy and control of capital flows. In the West, the real estate bubble and financialization have turned housing into a speculative asset rather than a basic good. Inflation, fueled by unchecked money printing, hits fixed incomes while asset prices soar. Those who already had wealth win; those who did not, lose.
The mirage of global growth
Some analyses argue that the world economy as a whole is actually improving, especially in Africa and Asia. Famines have disappeared from the headlines, and millions of people have escaped extreme poverty. The problem, then, would be a local one for the West: a system that no longer offers social mobility, where the elevator is broken. The open question is whether that Western model is sustainable or whether the future looks more like that of the countries that have decided not to play by the same rules.
There is no single answer. But the thread to unravel lies in the gap between the macroeconomic narrative and the microeconomic reality. As long as aggregate indicators keep hiding inequality, discontent will only keep growing.
Related debates in the forum
- Things are getting ugly in Tehran · 80395 replies
- BREAKING NEWS: CATACROC The judge suggests that Sánchez ("el one") knew about the maneuvers of the "colacas" · 58 replies
- The UCO enters Ferraz: operation underway against an illegal financing scheme of the PSOE · 343 replies
- Brutal U-turn by La Sens, they are going all out against the PSOE, it feels like watching Intereconomia jojojo · 34 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (13 replies).
More summaries
-
China doesn't raise rates: its economy is fighting deflation
Chinese CPI near zero and PPI in deflation explain why Beijing won't raise rates: lowering the price of money doesn't revive credit.
-
AI Ranks Israel Top Civilizational Model: Bias or Economics?
An AI selects Israel as the best civilizational model, sparking debate over data bias, privatization, and public spending.
-
Madrid vs. Shenzhen: Skyscrapers Don't Measure Economic Strength
Madrid has 5 skyscrapers, Shenzhen 460. This comparison ignores population, urban planning, and China's ban on new towers.
-
Spain to 30 Million: The Proposal and Its Achilles Heel
A proposal to reduce Spain’s population to 30-35 million clashes with an aging demographic and persistently low birth rates.
-
PACMA's housing proposals in Spain
PACMA's housing agenda includes affordable rent, curbing speculation and banning clauses that exclude pets from rental contracts.
-
Spain's Núñez Feijóo agrees to Jordi Wild interview (Abascal and Sánchez also invited)
Alberto Núñez Feijóo has accepted an interview with Jordi Wild after the YouTuber's public invitation. He is the first politician to take the step.