Madrid vs. Shenzhen: Skyscrapers Don't Measure Economic Strength

Madrid has 5 skyscrapers, Shenzhen 460. This comparison ignores population, urban planning, and China's ban on new towers.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Madrid has 5 skyscrapers, Shenzhen 460: A metric that measures nothing

Anyone comparing Madrid and Shenzhen by the number of skyscrapers has already lost the economic argument before it starts. The data is real and repeated like a verdict: 5 Madrid towers versus 460 in Shenzhen. But without context, this figure supports any narrative. Madrid has 6.5 million inhabitants; Shenzhen, 17.5. Vertical comparison is not a thermometer of prosperity, but a postcard.

Madrid's economy doesn't need skyscrapers to sustain its engine

Madrid is Spain's second pharmaceutical chemical hub, the second-largest exporting province, and Europe's fourth financial city. Catalonia and the Community of Madrid concentrate over 85% of the country's drug production. This contradicts the caricature of an economy based solely on civil servants and tourists. There is investment in R&D, a strong pharmaceutical industry, and a network of headquarters that inflates GDP per capita—an indicator which, as data analyses have pointed out, does not measure what reaches the average citizen's pocket.

China, the country that already slowed down skyscraper construction

The often omitted part: China banned skyscrapers. In July 2021, the National Development and Reform Commission vetoed buildings over 500 meters. In October 2021, the Ministry of Housing restricted towers over 150 meters in cities with fewer than three million inhabitants and set limits for 250-meter towers in major metropolises. According to its own regulations, China's future is not more towers, but controlling construction excess.

Delirious New York and the error of measuring the sky

The modern skyscraper was born in Chicago and Manhattan as a temple of office capitalism, not housing. Rem Koolhaas recounted this in "Delirious New York." High-rise housing came later, popularized by European socialist architecture in the 1920s and adopted in China. Some see pogre in these towers; others recall that Zurich, without skyscrapers, is hardly a third-world appendage. The European urban curvature, with life on the street, was a deliberate choice from the 1990s urban planning debate.

There is something illusory about the tourist returning from China fascinated by trains crossing the Himalayas. Impression is not an economic index. If the trend continues, neither China will add more skyscrapers nor Europe imitate Shenzhen. Next time someone uses an aerial photo as an argument, one should ask how many of those towers are empty, how many are offices, and how many contribute to those living below. The economy is not measured in height, and the mirage will last only as long as it takes to remember the uncomfortable fact: vertical construction is not a future plan, but largely a business of the past.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (119 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back