Ukraine breaks the front in Kherson and Russia annexes what it already loses
Can a territory be formally annexed while it is being lost? That is the question left on the table after the collapse of Russian lines in Kherson, described as Ukraine’s biggest advance in the south since the war began. Moscow responded by declaring those provinces part of Russia, even as retreating Russian troops blew up bridges behind them. The analysis points to an uncomfortable conclusion for the Kremlin: Russia has lost the initiative.
What exactly peine on the Kherson front?
The Ukrainian incursion is not a leak or a biased interpretation: it was acknowledged by Russian Defense spokesperson Igor Konashenkov, according to BBC reports. From there, official statements describe a deepening peine and a Russian retreat that destroys bridges to slow the advance. Simply put, the front line is no longer where it used to be.
The official Russian narrative tells a different story. Notes dated October 3, 2022, claim 109 units of Ukrainian military equipment were destroyed in a single day near Davydov Brod, and that six battalions sent to the region lost half their personnel in one day. The problem with such accounting is perennial: enemy losses are reported, but never shown. Some argue the Ukrainian offensive is costly; others point out that, ultimately, the ground changes hands.
Annexing four provinces whose borders do not yet exist
The paradox has a procedural aspect. New Russian provinces, Moscow argues, do not yet have defined borders, so no reaction is possible until the matter is clarified. In other words: the annexation is signed before the map to which it applies.
That same day, an ironic reading circulated widely: if the decree includes territory still administered by Ukraine, perhaps the Ukrainian parliament should ratify it. It was recalled that the border between the two countries has been defined since 1991. There is no room for interpretation here, and this is where the logic of the announcement breaks down.
The casualty count: 10,000 versus 300,000
The most cited calculation is also the hardest to verify. In the pessimistic scenario for Ukraine, estimates suggest around 10,000 Ukrainian dead versus 300,000 or 350,000 Russians. Those who support this ratio add that Russia is resorting to reservist mobilization, while its opponent, with fewer troops on the ground, continues to gain kilometers.
On the other side, responses focus on material costs and an unresolved question: few images of casualties from the Kherson offensive are circulating. The conversation over these days has shifted from triumphant announcements to accounting, and from accounting to geography.
Energy: revenues at highs while debating who sells to whom
The economic front plays out elsewhere. According to available data, Russian energy export revenues are at record highs, a figure used to counter the idea of a total blockade. The opposing argument is that this is not a case of “no one wants to sell to them,” but rather US pressure conditioning third-party countries.
The rebuttal is equally uncomfortable: sanctions by the West, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea cover most of the world’s technology, and this is reflected in import composition. A trade surplus, it is noted, can also be achieved by buying nothing.
Kadyrov, mobilization, and the winter factor
In the human dimension, Ramzan Kadyrov announced he would send his sons aged 14, 15, and 16 to the front. The scene sums up the tone of the moment. Meanwhile, reservist mobilization is seen as proof of a shortage of trained personnel.
Above all, there is the calendar. The most repeated hypothesis is that winter will do what armies cannot: freeze the advance, reward entrenched defense, and provide time to reorganize. Concrete, concrete, and more concrete, summarizes one stance.
With borders pending definition and bridges collapsing under retreating forces, only the cold is predictable. Annexing by decree takes an afternoon; explaining afterwards exactly where that annexed territory lies takes much longer.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (172 replies).