Trump Plans US Control of Gaza, Permanent Palestinian Displacement

Trump Announces US Takeover of Gaza and Population Displacement

Donald Trump stated bluntly at the White House, alongside a smiling Benjamin Netanyahu: The United States will "take over," "own," and demolish the Gaza Strip to rebuild it as the "Riviera of the Middle East." The plan includes the "permanent" displacement of 1.8 million Gazans to Egypt, Jordan, "and many other countries." No details were provided on how to execute a move that contradicts international law, half a dozen UN resolutions, and the will of those living there.

The announcement came during a press conference in the East Room, the largest space in the presidential residence. It trinc a private meeting, then full-team discussions, and a working dinner. The timing was critical: the second phase of the ceasefire and Iran's nuclear program were on the table. Trump also signed an executive order reinstating "maximum pressure" against Tehran. A two-for-one deal.

What "Taking Over" Gaza Means

There is no fine print. Trump spoke of "dismantling all dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons," creating "thousands and thousands of jobs," and turning the enclave into an "international" place where Palestinians could "also" live. In a subsequent interview, he admitted residents would have no right to return: "No, they wouldn't," he replied when asked. He immediately clarified that this was because there is nothing to return to, as Gaza is currently a wasteland of rubble.

Some argue this is a real estate operation disguised as foreign policy, a reading Trump fueled by describing himself as a developer: "Think of it as a future real estate development." The problem is that beneath this development live people who have signed no purchase agreements.

Two-State Solution Buried Without Ceremony

Washington's official policy for decades—two states, Israel and Palestine—was buried in one sentence: "We've tried the other way for decades and decades and decades. It's not going to work." Netanyahu finished the job by calling the initiative "something that can change history" in the Middle East and praising Trump for raising the goal that Gaza "never again poses a threat to Israel" to "a much higher level."

The Israeli Prime Minister defined the US President as "Israel's best friend ever in the White House." The honeymoon between the two, after a turbulent relationship during the first term, appears consolidated.

Egypt and Jordan: The "No" Trump Believes Will Become a "Yes"

The plan requires two neighboring countries to absorb nearly two million people. Both have firmly rejected the idea. However, Trump appealed to generosity: "I feel like even though they say no, the King of Jordan and the President of Egypt will open their hearts and give us the kind of land we need." This phrase summarizes the realism level of the proposal.

Economically, the equation is simple: Egypt faces a delicate financial situation, and Jordan already bears the weight of millions of refugees. Accepting the permanent transfer of Gazan population is not just a humanitarian issue; it is a direct risk to internal stability. Neither government has shown signs of yielding.

Debate: Ethnic Cleansing or Reconstruction?

Public discourse has split in two. One camp argues that expelling an entire population from its territory has a technical name in international law, and that "permanent" displacement fits that definition. The other defends that Gaza is today an uninhabitable field of rubble and that the only way out is to rebuild from scratch with external funding.

The most optimistic calculation assumes reconstruction will generate employment and wealth; the pessimistic scenario starts from the premise that no one guarantees return or land ownership. In the middle, an uncomfortable fact: 90% of buildings are collapsed or unusable, according to descriptions used in the announcement itself. Rebuilding that takes years. Displacing people takes a decree.

The Gibraltar Precedent and Antiestéticar of Exporting the Formula

Historical parallels are not lacking. The operation recalls, with differences, what England did with Gibraltar: expelling most of the native population and replacing them with outsiders. The comparison circulates with irony and is not gratuitous.

The lingering question is whether such solutions become normalized. If forced population displacement becomes a legitimate tool of foreign policy, the precedent is set. And precedents, in geopolitics, always find imitators.

---

Trump promised real estate development in one of the world's most conflict-ridden areas. He did not explain who pays, who guarantees security, or what happens if Egypt and Jordan maintain their "no." With these elements, the announcement will likely remain just that—an announcement—and the Strip will continue for years as a wasteland with people underneath. But the two-state solution is already buried, and no one will dig it up.