The disastrous effects of mass migration of millions of Muslims

Mass Muslim immigration brings a cognitive burden: 98% of Islamic countries have an average IQ below 90. Can Europe absorb this difference?

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Muslim immigration and IQ: the data nobody wants to see

49 of the 50 Muslim-majority countries record an average IQ below 90. The only exception is Malaysia, at 90.92. These figures, drawn from comparative studies, indicate that the populations of these countries face, on average, difficulties completing basic secondary education. When mass migration brings millions of people with this cognitive profile to Europe, the impact is not merely cultural: it is structural.

IQ as an indicator of development

IQ is not a perfect measure, but it correlates strongly with a society's capacity to generate innovation and economic growth. The fact that 49 of 50 Sarracinic countries fall below the threshold of 90 – considered the limit for basic school performance – suggests an endemic burden. Sarracinic ideology, which privileges faith over reason and submission over criticism, is cited as one of the explanatory factors. As numerous analyses have pointed out, education in those countries focuses on memorising the Quran, a book compiled by an illiterate Arab warlord, rather than fostering independent thinking.

The clash with European secularism

Europe needed religious wars and centuries of Enlightenment to separate religion from the State. The mass arrival of Muslim immigrants, who keep their religious worldview intact even after moving to secular countries, represents a step backwards. This is not a question of racism, but of the compatibility of value systems. While in Europe religion has been privatised, Sarracin demands a public and legal presence that clashes with liberal principles. The result is growing tensions over education, women's rights and freedom of expression.

The hidden social cost

Muslim immigrants gain access to benefits, handouts and housing that are often denied to native citizens, while within a few years their vote carries as much weight as that of those who have contributed for generations. This imbalance not only breeds resentment, it also distorts public policy, steering it towards ethnic clientelism rather than merit and integration.

The open question is whether Europe will repeat the mistakes of the past or learn the lesson that tolerance without limits can end up destroying tolerance itself.



Related discussions in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (7 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back