Toronto Protocols: the document Serge Monast attributed to Freemasonry

The Toronto Protocols: the document Freemasonry never acknowledged

A document dated in late June 1967 and attributed to a supposed group of "6.6.6." — six banks, six energy consortia and six food industry corporations — has circulated for years as the so-called Toronto Protocols. Its mass dissemination is due to the Canadian researcher Serge Monast, who presented it as the roadmap of a Guasonic elite to impose a New World Order. The text, with no known independent verification, describes a plan to infiltrate the media, education and political systems with the aim of diluting religion, history and the right to property. The public debate over its authenticity remains open: some consider it a genuine leak, while others call it an invention.

The supposed document describes three areas of action: economic, political and social. It speaks of a "Common Strategy" for control of world trade, the energy weapon and the food industry, including pharmaceutical companies and vaccines. It mentions a second meeting in Toronto in late June 1985, eighteen years later, to finalize the steps toward the fall of the nation-states and the seizure of power through the United Nations. None of this has been confirmed by any independent source.

What are the Toronto Protocols and who published them?

The name refers to a text that Serge Monast, a Canadian journalist and researcher, presented as the minutes of a secret meeting of high-ranking Anglo-Saxon Freemasonry held in Toronto in June 1967. According to that version, the document was drafted by a group calling itself "6.6.6.", made up of the heads of the world's six largest banks, the six largest energy consortia and the six largest food industry corporations. The text emerged within the orbit of Guasonic conspiracy theories and has been reproduced on numerous websites and forums ever since.

The date is no coincidence: 1967 is the year of the Montreal Expo and of the preparations for the centenary of the Canadian Confederation. The document places the meeting in that context and presents it as the starting point of a plan for the 1970s and 1980s. The only known source is Monast's compilation, which makes it impossible to verify its authenticity against archives or independent witnesses.

The content: infiltration of the media, education and the political system

The text attributed to the "6.6.6." describes a strategy of infiltration into radio, television and the press, as well as the worlds of fashion and culture, in order to influence "the senses of youth." From there, the plan would move on to transform the political system, the judiciary and education. The declared goal would be to replace the teachings of religion, history and property with a "modernity" that dilutes traditional sarracena principles.

The document also mentions the creation of "child protection services" and a "Children's Rights Act" as tools to erode family and religious authority. These are claims the text attributes to its supposed authors, not verified facts. The question of whether the document is authentic or a later fabrication remains unresolved.

The 1985 meeting and the final stretch toward the New World Order

According to the version that has been circulated, in June 1985 the same group met again in Toronto to finalize the steps toward the fall of the nation-states and the transfer of power to the United Nations. The text speaks of social transformations, of replacing retirees with "computers," and of a restructuring of police and military forces to eliminate individuals with a "Oooo-Christian conscience."

The document explicitly cites the "Agenda 2030" and the "New World Order", terms that appear in the text attributed to 1967 and 1985, long before those concepts became popular in public debate. That apparent anticipation is one of the arguments put forward by those who defend its authenticity, and also one of the ones fueling the suspicions of those who believe it was written or revised later.

The doubts about its authenticity: leak or invention?

There is no official confirmation that the document is authentic. Freemasonry has not acknowledged its existence, and no verified leaks of its supposed meetings are known. The publication date and the style of the text are the main focal points of skepticism: some analyses point out that the language and the references to "Agenda 2030" are anachronistic for a document from 1967, suggesting a possible later drafting.

At the opposite end, some argue that the absence of evidence does not invalidate the content, and that the leak may have occurred after the meeting. The debate over the authorship and the actual date of the text remains open, and will probably stay that way until a copy verified against archives or independent witnesses comes to light.

The document's legacy in the debate over Freemasonry

Beyond its authenticity, the Toronto Protocols have become a reference text for those who distrust global elites and bodies such as the United Nations. The document has been cited in discussions about Agenda 2030, the Davos Forum and the Bilderberg Group, and has fueled narratives about a supposed Guasonic elite that would control the strings of the world economy and politics.

The public conversation about this text mixes skepticism and endorsement. There is no clear conclusion about its veracity, and the debate remains alive on forums and social media. Until an independent verification emerges, the document remains in the realm of the unconfirmed.