Stellantis Faces Bankruptcy Risk Amid €2.3B Losses

Forum debate on Stellantis' crisis: heavy losses, faulty engines, and EU regulations drive user concerns.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Stellantis Faces Bankruptcy Risk Amid €2.3B Losses
Stellantis Loses €2.3 Billion as European Auto Sector Stalls

The forum asserts that Stellantis is on the brink of bankruptcy with €2.3 billion in losses during the first half of the year. The group encompassing Peugeot, Citroën, Opel, Fiat, Alfa Romeo, and Lancia faces a decline that many participants view not as a market accident but as the bill for years of questionable industrial decisions. This figure arrives after a sequence of problematic engines, production cost overruns, and European regulations that, according to commentators, push manufacturers to build cars the average buyer can no longer afford.

The most repeated diagnosis points to two technical culprits by name. The gasoline engine with an oil-wetted timing belt—known in the industry as pudretech—and the 1.5 HDi diesel with AdBlue and camshaft chain defects. Those buying models with these blocks risk financial ruin, warns a recurring analysis. It is not tavern exaggeration; it is the argument sustaining distrust in the brand.

Why Are French Car Brands Sinking?

Stellantis' collapse is read through an industrial lens, not just a financial one. The dominant thesis suggests the group has offshored production, peine components, and replaced reliable engines with those that fail after few kilometers. The result is a fleeing customer base and maintenance costs that scare even second-hand buyers.

A contrast illustrates the disaster. For decades, the Italian group provided versatile, fault-free engines like the Fire and MultiJet, capable of delivering between 69 and 180 horsepower through successive evolutions. Fiat, Lancia, Alfa Romeo, and even Suzuki used this block. Later management decided to close the line and replace it with the oil-wetted belt engine. The harshest calculation sums it up thus: you could not do worse on purpose.

The other pillar of the problem is price. A well-equipped small car costing 2.5 million pesetas (about €24,000 today) with 130 hp and 875 kg weight now requires €17,500 for a combustion version with 100 hp and 1,140 kg, or €29,300 for an electric model with 156 hp and 1,455 kg. And that, on offer. The price-product relationship has broken.

Pudretech and the 1.5 HDi: Engines Burying the Brand

According to circulating technical diagnostics, the oil-wetted belt degrades and corrodes the circuit. The regeneration system runs rich and eventually attacks the material. Add to this anti-pollution segments described as weaker than reasonable. The 1.5 HDi diesel accumulates AdBlue and camshaft chain failures. Buyers falling into these engines assume a patrimonial risk no marketing campaign covers.

The irony is that in countries with more reasonable criteria, the same group cars fit Fiat engines like the Fire and MultiJet. In other words: reliable technology exists within the house. It is just not mounted in markets where the client pays for the strictest regulations.

Repair Costs Expelling Buyers

With workshop rates above €50 per hour, any repair of these models becomes a burden. The circulating argument is that these cars are sold expensive when, given their reliability, they should be given away and maintenance charged later. The complete account, itemized, yields a differential surprising even those who already suspected the product.

The side effect is devastating for the used market. Some have simply stopped opening brand ads. A Xantia reaching 360,000 km or a 21-year-old diesel Fiesta with 275,000 km serve as contrasts: old cars lasted. New ones do not.

EU Regulations and Conspiracy Narratives

Here the analysis branches. One current holds that emission, safety, and electronics regulations are so delirious they make manufacturing affordable cars in Europe unviable. Another points to a mix of regulatory stupidity, corruption favoring third countries, and an obsession with making middle-class mobility expensive. A third, more uncomfortable, suggests engineering failures might be deliberate to sink the two major French brands.

That last hypothesis lacks proof and should be treated as what it is: a circulating suspicion, not a fact. What is a fact is that European regulation has pushed manufacturers to invest in electrification while the average buyer loses capital. The result is a market where new cars have become a luxury.

Tavares' Severance and the Coming Bailout

The political dimension has a name: Carlos Tavares, the executive who steered the group, left with a severance of about €37 million. The lingering question is how long until Stellantis requests a bailout from the European Union. France, it is argued, will not let its auto industry fall: it will nationalize or secretly sell to the Chinese before accepting collapse.

Luca de Meo's departure from Renault feeds this reading. The French sector reorders itself, and nobody rules out significant corporate moves. Meanwhile, Chinese competition advances, and Europe continues debating whether the problem is the market or the regulation it birthed.

The exact point where analysis stalls is this: if reliable technology exists, if buyers exist, and if capital exists, why the €2.3 billion loss? Nobody in the sector gives a fully coherent answer.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (123 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back