Spain’s hourly output unchanged since 2005, wages stagnant

Spain produces the same per hour as in 2005 and salaries remain stuck

Spanish productivity has risen by 0.6% a year since 1995. In 2026, output per hour is nearly identical to that of 2005. This data point explains why the median salary has remained around net €1,500-€1,600 twenty years after the term "mileurista" was coined. If you do not produce more per hour, your boss cannot pay you more without losing money. And Spain has not produced more per hour for two decades.

The diagnosis presented is neither left-wing nor right-wing: it is accounting-based. Between 2022 and 2025, GDP grew by 16%, but productivity only by 1%. We added more workers, we did not work better. The chosen model—tourism, hospitality, construction, and retail, what El País called an low-cost economy—grows with low wages, tiny companies, and modest investment.

94% of companies have fewer than ten employees

The average Spanish company has 8.8 employees; the European average is 12.1. A company of eight people cannot invest in technology, training, or exports. And if it does not invest, productivity does not rise; if productivity does not rise, wages do not rise. The circle closes on itself.

There is a detail bordering on the absurd: there are 62% more companies with exactly 49 employees than statistically expected. Why? Starting from 50 workers, a works council, union delegate, and more paperwork are required. So employers stay at 49 to avoid growing. The law meant to protect workers ends up freezing headcount at the door of growth.

R&D at 1.4% of GDP vs. 2.2% European average

Spain invests 1.4% of GDP in R&D. The European average is 2.2%. Germany is at 3.1%. Between 2000 and 2007, two out of every three euros invested went into real estate. Not technology, not machinery, not training. Result: many university graduates working jobs unrelated to their studies and companies that do not innovate.

Minimum wage up 61% drags rest down

Here lies the most perverse paradox of the last two decades. The SMI (minimum wage) rose from €736 in 2018 to €1,184 in 2025, a 61% increase. Good. But the median salary did not rise equally: in 2005 it was 2.1 times the minimum; today it is only 1.5 times. The proportion of workers earning up to 125% of the SMI has gone from 7.9% to 22.8%. This is the phenomenon of bunching.

Translated: previously, a veteran with ten years' experience earned €1,600 and a newcomer €900. Now the newcomer earns €1,184 by law and the veteran stays at €1,300 because the company does not raise his pay. The floor rises, the ceiling does not. And the worker remains in milquini (near-minimum territory) even after fifteen years in the same chair.

Fifteen years of 20% unemployment stripped bargaining power

For fifteen years, Spain lived with unemployment between 20-26%. With five million unemployed, no one asks for a raise: if you ask, they remind you there are a hundred waiting outside. That became culture. Although unemployment is now at 11.8%, union membership is 12.5%, below the OECD average (15.2%). Temporary contracts, though reduced, still hinder any claims.

The result is visible in rent bills. Wages rose with inflation, but rent has doubled since 2005. The mileurista then shared flats and barely got by. The one in 2026 earns €1,500 and pays €1,163 in rent in Valencia: leaving €337 for everything else.

---

The conversation quickly turned to who is responsible. Some point to deindustrialization and mass labor influx as causes of wage stagnation; others argue that poor wages existed during the bubble and before the euro, and the problem is the production model, not borders. The thesis of dependency also appears: EU membership and ties to the US as corsets preventing other industrial policies. And the repeated suspicion that the incentive system—subsidies, cronyism, committees—perpetuates the status quo regardless of who votes.

A calculation circulating questions the starting figure: if real inflation is measured by VAT revenue—from €36.85 billion in 2005 to €99.3 billion in 2025—the €1,000 then would be equivalent to €2,690 today, not €1,600. With this adjustment, the loss of purchasing power would be much greater than official CPI acknowledges.

Can the circle be broken? The prediction, with reservations: without raising hourly productivity, any SMI increase will continue compressing the wage scale against the floor. And productivity does not rise by decree. It rises with larger companies, more capital per worker, and less real estate speculation. As long as 94% of the fabric has fewer than ten employees, the mileurismo will have successors.