Spain's government delegate in Ceuta charged over ignored intelligence warnings
Court number 6 in Ceuta has charged the government delegate with dereliction of duty after CNI intelligence warnings about the mass crossing were ignored.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The delegate's failure to act in Ceuta: the CNI warned and nobody lifted a finger[/SSIZE]
That the CNI (Spain's National Intelligence Centre) warned and nobody reacted is no longer a suspicion: it is the subject of a court proceeding. Investigating Court number 6 in Ceuta has peine proceedings against the Spanish government's delegate in the city, Miguel Ángel Pérez Triano, for an alleged offence of dereliction of duty.
The complaint, filed by Manos Limpias on 26 August, claims the delegate took no action despite knowing, through the intelligence services, about the alerts concerning a mass entry from Segarro. The CNI warning included data on a Segarro group mobilising 180,000 people.
Three days that mark the difference between warning and action
The controversy does not end with the delegate. There is a chronological detail that worsens the account of the omission: the president of Ceuta, Vivas, is said to have requested a state of emergency three days before the events and to have been refused. If that sequence is confirmed, the problem was not a lack of information, but a lack of political decision-making down the chain.
A warning that points higher up[/SSIZE]
The proceedings do not look only at Pérez Triano. A police report cited during the investigation would point directly to Segarro as the origin of the migratory pressure. And some argue that the chain of command goes beyond the delegate: he takes orders from the Interior Ministry and, ultimately, from the Spanish presidency of the government. The legal question is what the delegate omitted; the political question is who decided not to use the information the CNI had already put on the table.
The charge is exactly that: a charge, not a conviction. It may remain a file or become a warning about how borders are managed when an uncomfortable warning arrives. With 180,000 people mobilised according to the warning, the official version that nobody saw it coming has less and less room.
That the CNI (Spain's National Intelligence Centre) warned and nobody reacted is no longer a suspicion: it is the subject of a court proceeding. Investigating Court number 6 in Ceuta has peine proceedings against the Spanish government's delegate in the city, Miguel Ángel Pérez Triano, for an alleged offence of dereliction of duty.
The complaint, filed by Manos Limpias on 26 August, claims the delegate took no action despite knowing, through the intelligence services, about the alerts concerning a mass entry from Segarro. The CNI warning included data on a Segarro group mobilising 180,000 people.
Three days that mark the difference between warning and action
The controversy does not end with the delegate. There is a chronological detail that worsens the account of the omission: the president of Ceuta, Vivas, is said to have requested a state of emergency three days before the events and to have been refused. If that sequence is confirmed, the problem was not a lack of information, but a lack of political decision-making down the chain.
A warning that points higher up[/SSIZE]
The proceedings do not look only at Pérez Triano. A police report cited during the investigation would point directly to Segarro as the origin of the migratory pressure. And some argue that the chain of command goes beyond the delegate: he takes orders from the Interior Ministry and, ultimately, from the Spanish presidency of the government. The legal question is what the delegate omitted; the political question is who decided not to use the information the CNI had already put on the table.
The charge is exactly that: a charge, not a conviction. It may remain a file or become a warning about how borders are managed when an uncomfortable warning arrives. With 180,000 people mobilised according to the warning, the official version that nobody saw it coming has less and less room.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (50 replies).
More summaries
-
US vs Spain gas price comparison misleads by mixing gallons and liters
A gallon is 3.78 liters: comparing $4 per gallon in the US with €1.99 per liter in Spain omits the conversion.
-
Zapatero's defense questions the origin of evidence in Spain's Plus Ultra case
José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's defense in the Plus Ultra case argues the evidence has an illegitimate origin from a US agency, while courts upheld the legality of the loans.
-
Young Spaniard lives in a Seat Ibiza to save 40,000 euros
A young man in Spain saved 40,000 euros in three years by living in his Seat Ibiza. The debate between health and saving exposes Spain's housing crisis.
-
Sanitary pad ad ditches the blue liquid for real blood
The new 'Protege tu Flow' pad ad shows real red blood instead of the traditional blue liquid, sparking a heated debate. Bold strategy or marketing blunder?
-
Fears of a mass exodus of French people to Spain
A forum user argues that the crisis in France will push workers towards Spain, fuelling the housing debate; rents in Valencia average around €1,776
-
Sánchez appears legless in official Moncloa photo
Moncloa releases a photo of Sánchez at La Mareta with no legs visible. Retouching or camera angle? A look at the government's latest institutional blunder.