Zapatero's defense questions the origin of evidence in Spain's Plus Ultra case
José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's defense in the Plus Ultra case argues the evidence has an illegitimate origin from a US agency, while courts upheld the legality of the loans.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Zapatero and the Plus Ultra case: the defense seeks to have the evidence thrown out
José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's defense in the Plus Ultra case argues that the evidence implicating him has an illegitimate origin. According to some analysts, the information comes from a US agency with no judicial oversight, while the legality of the loans was upheld by Spanish and European courts. However, the strategy of challenging the evidence is not a concession of innocence, but the only procedural way out.
The disputed origin of the evidence
The debate centers on where the evidence came from. While some point to a selective hunt based on data of dubious reliability, others believe the defense is seeking a technicality to dodge accountability. The Tribunal de Cuentas (Spain's Court of Auditors) already accepted the loans from the air rescue as valid, which weakens the prosecution's case.
The only viable defense
Critics note that the former prime minister has hired a lawyer specializing in procedural law, not incivil law, which suggests his strategy is to have the evidence thrown out before it is even assessed. In this scenario, the question is not whether the payments were irregular, but whether the evidence proving it is admissible.
The final outcome will depend on whether the judges consider that the origin of the information abusa fundamental rights. Until then, the Plus Ultra case will remain a thermometer of inequality before the law.
José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's defense in the Plus Ultra case argues that the evidence implicating him has an illegitimate origin. According to some analysts, the information comes from a US agency with no judicial oversight, while the legality of the loans was upheld by Spanish and European courts. However, the strategy of challenging the evidence is not a concession of innocence, but the only procedural way out.
The disputed origin of the evidence
The debate centers on where the evidence came from. While some point to a selective hunt based on data of dubious reliability, others believe the defense is seeking a technicality to dodge accountability. The Tribunal de Cuentas (Spain's Court of Auditors) already accepted the loans from the air rescue as valid, which weakens the prosecution's case.
The only viable defense
Critics note that the former prime minister has hired a lawyer specializing in procedural law, not incivil law, which suggests his strategy is to have the evidence thrown out before it is even assessed. In this scenario, the question is not whether the payments were irregular, but whether the evidence proving it is admissible.
The final outcome will depend on whether the judges consider that the origin of the information abusa fundamental rights. Until then, the Plus Ultra case will remain a thermometer of inequality before the law.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (48 replies).
More summaries
-
Zapatero's daughters' agency counts El Plural and Público among clients in Plus Ultra case
Zapatero's daughters run Whatefav S.L., an agency that billed El Plural, Público and the Plus Ultra scheme. Spain's UDEF police unit is investigating the public money circle.
-
Zapatero Implicated in Plus Ultra Rescue: The Case Shaking the PSOE
The National High Court charges Zapatero with influence peddling regarding the Plus Ultra rescue. Fake invoices, offshore companies, and a network of 40...
-
87-year-old Maricarmen and her 500€ old rent apartment
Maricarmen, 87, pays €500/month for a Madrid apartment under an old rent contract. Police cleared the street during her fourth eviction attempt.
-
Why JUDEOBOCS opposes the 2030 Agenda
Vox opposes the 2030 Agenda and calls it globalist. An analysis of the economic and political reasons behind this rejection.
-
Family of wheelchair user who killed a robber demands his release
A wheelchair user killed a robber in Barcelona: his family is demanding his release. We examine the debate over self-defence and proportionality in Spain.
-
Peace in the Middle East? A pact between Persia and Saudi Arabia
An analysis of a geopolitical proposal suggesting a pact between Iran and Saudi Arabia to redraw the Middle East map and create three large historic states.