You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Spain’s Electoral Debate: Can You Legally Dodge Serving on a Polling Board?
A viral thread argues that ignoring official polling board notifications avoids legal penalties, sparking debate over Spain’s 70-euro gratuity and 2015 notification laws.
A doorbell rings twice, and no one answers. A Correos notice slides under the door and ends up in the trash. A citizen, having never read an official notification, escapes sitting at a polling station all Sunday while collecting 70 euros for a shift that can last 24 hours. This is the mechanism defended in online forums, gaining traction during election seasons with overlapping regional, municipal, and European polls, where draws multiply, especially in small towns.
The core argument is simple: avoiding notification is not a crime. If the Correos notice is not collected, no formal notification occurs, and without notification, there is no obligation to appear. The strategy mirrors tactics used in evicting tenants: simply ignore everything. Defenders insist this is perfectly legal.
What the law says about failed notifications
Article 44 of Spain’s Law 39/2015 governs 'notificación infructuosa' (failed notification): when the recipient is unknown or unreachable, an announcement is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE). This is the 'edict' route. The question remains: does this publication count as notification if you never saw the paper?
Some argue yes: after deadlines pass, you are officially notified, and failing to appear could be an electoral offense. Others counter that edicts are rarely published during elections due to time and cost constraints, allowing municipalities to skip to the next name on the list. This discrepancy determines whether the trick works or becomes an aggravating factor.
How much polling board members earn
The gratuity averages around 70 euros, according to those affected. Some report 75, others 80, and a few up to 90. Shifts can last 24 hours and do not count as Social Security contributions unless you are already employed; it is a personal service, not a contract. Critics compare this to judges earning 4,000 euros or police earning 700 euros for extra shifts, concluding the state undervalues civic duty.
Economically, paying 1,000 euros per election would cost roughly 200 million euros, recoverable via income tax (IRPF) by cutting other budgets. While institutions ignore this proposal, it fuels public frustration.
Exemptions that exist and those that don’t
Being over 70 exempts you. Having dependent children also exempts you. Having been summoned three times allows you to reject future calls. Board presidents must hold a high school diploma or vocational training; vice-presidents need only basic literacy.
Not attending school does not exempt you. A vice-president might barely sign their name but becomes crucial for counting if they know everyone in town. The law makes no distinction.
The real shift: counting, envelopes, and police
Shifts start early and end late. Some finish by noon; others drag on. Manual counting repeats if numbers do not match. Some presidents close quickly; others get stuck. Envelopes are transported to court on foot or by police car, depending on the town. Some have seen envelopes fall in the rain, causing panic. Police acompañante you, but not everyone wants the back seat.
If you work for an employer, you get five paid hours the trinc Monday if your shift starts in the morning. Self-employed workers get nothing.
What happens if you don’t show up
Failing to appear is a crime, though rarely punished. Prosecution costs are prohibitive for the state, and substitutes are always available. The risk of punishment is low but not zero. The 'no-show' strategy relies on this practical impunity: no notification means no obligation; no obligation means no crime.
The real debate is about legitimacy. Some see the polling board as a democratic celebration; others see it as poorly paid forced labor. The former view avoiding it as sabotage; the latter argue that accepting 70 euros for 24 hours is the true sabotage.
The lingering question is not whether the trick works, but how many citizens will try it. With four draws in a year, the odds of being selected are no longer anecdotal. And the doorbell, in the end, always rings twice.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (326 replies).
Online debate compares a €29 million German tank with a €2.3 million Chinese one, examining commissions, industrial capacity, and historical precedents.