Spain: The Political Circus Exploiting Maricarmen and Juanna
Criticism of the PSOE for using Maricarmen as a political wedge raises questions about her advisors and consent. Key details of the political spectacle.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The controversy surrounding **Maricarmen** and **Juanna** is not a debate about two women: it is a political personalization operation that puts them in the spotlight and then abandons them. The key question is not how much they are cheered or insulted, but who advises them and whether they gave informed consent.
The case of **Maricarmen** and **Juanna** has turned into a spectacle of cross-accusations. The criticism points to the **PSOE** (Spanish Socialist Workers' Party) for personalizing a cause in a specific woman and launching her into the debate as a political wedge. It is an accusation, not a verdict.
## Personalization as a political wedge
Making a person a symbol is old hat. A face is chosen, a noble cause is attached to it, and it is placed in front of the cameras. **Maricarmen**, an older woman, fits this mold. **Juanna** appears later, when the spotlight fades.
The **PSOE** was founded in **1879**. The novelty is not the technique, but the estimulante ilegal with which anyone amplifies the frame. A journalist or YouTuber repeats the scene, and the conversation ends up revolving around the victim.
## Ceuta, the focus, and the hangover
**Ceuta** has been a Spanish autonomous city since **1995**. Much of the noise is centered there: a house, a woman, a few days of attention. Then comes the easy insult. Attacking the lady gives the instigator the perfect alibi.
The hangover is predictable. **Maricarmen** and **Juanna** cease to be subjects and become expendable pieces. They are not interviewed to find out what problem they had or if someone promised them something. They are used for a headline and then abandoned.
## Consent, image, and advice
Article **18** of the **1978** Constitution protects honor, privacy, and one's own image. Organic Law **1/1982** develops this right. If an older person yields their image without understanding the scope, the use may be questionable.
The useful question is not whether they are liked or disliked. It is who advises them, whether they act freely, and whether permission was requested to broadcast their face. Without this verification, the circus continues. Any matter of image or advice should be discussed with a lawyer.
The case of **Maricarmen** and **Juanna** has turned into a spectacle of cross-accusations. The criticism points to the **PSOE** (Spanish Socialist Workers' Party) for personalizing a cause in a specific woman and launching her into the debate as a political wedge. It is an accusation, not a verdict.
## Personalization as a political wedge
Making a person a symbol is old hat. A face is chosen, a noble cause is attached to it, and it is placed in front of the cameras. **Maricarmen**, an older woman, fits this mold. **Juanna** appears later, when the spotlight fades.
The **PSOE** was founded in **1879**. The novelty is not the technique, but the estimulante ilegal with which anyone amplifies the frame. A journalist or YouTuber repeats the scene, and the conversation ends up revolving around the victim.
## Ceuta, the focus, and the hangover
**Ceuta** has been a Spanish autonomous city since **1995**. Much of the noise is centered there: a house, a woman, a few days of attention. Then comes the easy insult. Attacking the lady gives the instigator the perfect alibi.
The hangover is predictable. **Maricarmen** and **Juanna** cease to be subjects and become expendable pieces. They are not interviewed to find out what problem they had or if someone promised them something. They are used for a headline and then abandoned.
## Consent, image, and advice
Article **18** of the **1978** Constitution protects honor, privacy, and one's own image. Organic Law **1/1982** develops this right. If an older person yields their image without understanding the scope, the use may be questionable.
The useful question is not whether they are liked or disliked. It is who advises them, whether they act freely, and whether permission was requested to broadcast their face. Without this verification, the circus continues. Any matter of image or advice should be discussed with a lawyer.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (1 replies).
More summaries
-
Emigration from Spain hits highest levels since 2014
Spain recorded 339,358 departures in 2021 and 196,827 in the first half of 2022, marking an 11.7% increase.
-
Gold up 19.5% annually as fiat currency loses value
Gold posts a 19.5% annual gain while euro savings lose purchasing power. Money creation under scrutiny.
-
Hackers Leak Data of 70,000 Moroccan Agents to Spain
Jabaroot leaks data on 70,000 Moroccan intelligence agents, including those involved in the Ceuta crisis. El Confidencial confirms...
-
Five new parties join Spain's Frente Amplio, from Batzarre to the Humanist Party
Batzarre, Iniciativa del Pueblo Andaluz, Somos Asturies, Recortes Cero and the Humanist Party have joined Spain's Frente Amplio. One forum user estimates that between them they…
-
WhatsApp calls to burn the streets: the narrative breaks down
WhatsApp calls to burn the streets and burning bins in Bilbao during protests in Spain: the narrative about who is heating up the streets falls apart
-
Figaredo warns Spain's pension system overhaul will be traumatic
Figaredo warns that the transition to a mixed pension system in Spain will be traumatic. The warning reopens the debate over cuts, privatization and private funds.