You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Spain decriminalises insulting the King while investigating Sánchez effigy attack
Spain's government decriminalises insults to the King, yet Madrid's high court investigates the beating of a Sánchez effigy. Double standard or a legal question?
Double standard: criticism of the King decriminalised, effigy attack investigated
Is it legal to burn a photo of the King but not to beat an effigy of Sánchez? The debate over the Incivil Code reform the Spanish government is preparing pits two legal planes against each other which, to the average citizen, smell of double standards. While the government pushes forward the decriminalisation of insults to the Crown and offences against Spain (ultrajes a España), Madrid's high court (Audiencia de Madrid) has peine the case against the activists who beat an effigy of the prime minister on 8 March.
Official proposal: freedom to criticise the monarch
The draft seeks to remove opinion offences against the Crown, equating them with freedom of expression. In practice, it would miccionan that calling the king a «doormat» or ridiculing him would no longer be incivil prosecutable. A long-standing aspiration of the left which, paradoxically, clashes with the judicial reality on the other side of the spectrum.
The effigy case: threats, not insults
Last March, a group of protesters placed an effigy of Pedro Sánchez in the street, beat it and chanted slogans such as «que te vote Txapote» (a reference to an ETA hitman). Madrid's high court, after initially dismissing the case, ordered the investigation peine upon finding possible serious threats. This is not a hate crime or slander, but an examination of whether the context and the shouts constitute real intimidation. The legal difference is subtle: burning a photo of the king is symbolic; beating an effigy of the prime minister, accompanied by explicit threats, could cross the line.
The political reading: a misleading comparison
Those who defend the government's consistency argue that criticising an institution is not the same as threatening a person. But the opposition sees hypocrisy: «Sánchez wants to protect himself while leaving the Crown unprotected». The debate shows that, beyond legal technicalities, gesture politics matters. And here the gestures are chasing their own tail.
So, in short, you can insult the king without antiestéticar of jail, but if you beat an effigy of the prime minister, you had better have a good lawyer.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (10 replies).
The King reportedly summoned Sánchez at Zarzuela following his meeting with the military establishment and the announcement of the Ceuta trip. The official agenda makes no mention of the encounter, and...
Pedro Sánchez insists the King has been in power for over 20 years, but Felipe VI ascended in 2014. The criticism regarding Ceuta and Melilla hides a deeper debate...
The housing protest culminates in a campout in Sol with the 2011 slogan. The electoral calendar and a potential non-payment regulation are central to the analysis.
A group of Airbnb tourists mocked a neighbourhood protest in La Mina, Barcelona, sparking an almost violent backlash. The incident reopens the debate on holiday rentals in vulnerable districts.
A user finds that ChatGPT ignores orders to exclude media critical of Spain's government when fact-checking the face masks case. Programmed bias or AI insubordination?
European identity as social engineering: deindustrialization, desired dishonor and a Recovery Fund that never reaches the productive economy. An analysis.