Russian Mining Grows While Strong Ruble Cools Inflation
Can you strangle a country that produces its own gas, wheat, and most necessities? Data suggests no. The Russian Composite PMI returned to positive growth in June, inflation fell last month due to the ruble's strength, and the Bank of Russia sees signs of growth in sectors like mining. The Russian economy is "stabilizing" and some sectors are growing, while oil trades around $94 per barrel.
Why Sanctions Aren't Sinking the Russian Economy
The strongest argument is scale. Sanctioning an economy this large and resource-rich differs vastly from sanctioning a state with little arable land: for the former, trade closures are an inconvenience; for the latter, strangulation. It is the difference between cutting off water to someone with a well versus someone without.
The second part of the reasoning is more uncomfortable. Closing Western markets pushes Russia to reorient toward Asia and rebuild supply chains. The hypothesis is that adaptation costs initially but later becomes a competitive advantage: those left out—Europe—struggle to recover what they used to buy. Here there is no hard data, only suspicion.
Oil at $94 and the Discount That No Longer Matters
With crude near $94, the business of Russian discounts blurs. India committed to buying cheap oil as long as the differential was sufficient, but when international prices hover around $90, margins narrow and buyers can ignore offers. The effect is double: Moscow loses its main commercial lever and the market reallocates without agreements.
This detail often goes unnoticed in official accounts. Energy sanctions don't work by prohibition, but by arithmetic. When the differential disappears, buyers don't need coercion: they stop buying on their own risk.
How Much Has Russian Unemployment Risen Since the War Began?
The figure presented is a jump from 4.3% to 9% in four months. This is the only measure of internal damage provided, contrasting with other indicators: neither PMI, inflation, nor mining point in that direction. This clash between labor data and activity metrics is likely the core issue.
The European Cost of Dropping Russian Gas
On the other side of the balance is the price paid by the sanctioner. Some argue the measures aren't destroying the Russian economy but the European one, and that energy bills will outweigh any loss for the sanctioned party. The warning repeats: energy prices and availability are the weak points, and decisions were made without prior impact studies.
Added to this is a more uncomfortable reading: that the intended effect wasn't so much bending the adversary as reordering energy flows, with costs distributed among European consumers. No one signs this thesis. Nor does anyone refute it with numbers.
Volunteers, Battalions, and the Fine Print of Mobilization
The military front isn't excluded from analysis. According to the Institute for the Study of War, the Kremlin reportedly ordered regions to form volunteer battalions for the invasion instead of declaring general mobilization. The interpretation is avoiding the political and social cost of mass recruitment while official discourse speaks of stability.
And the most repeated data on Russian material capacity is that gasoline lasts three days, a figure announced since March that never materialized. Like the counterattack that was supposed to reach Moscow.
The Closure No One Signs
With PMI in green, inflation moderating, and the ruble sustained, the predicted collapse of the Russian economy is delayed. Someone should warn the sanctions: they haven't noticed.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (117 replies).
Ukrainian military intelligence concedes battlefield victory is unlikely, pointing to Moscow talks starting in 2025. The core issue remains Crimea and annexed territories.