Russia tests Geran warheads against bridges: they fail to cut the cables
Kyiv's Yuzhniy bridge withstood an attack by new cable-cutting warheads on Geran drones, according to open-source conflict monitoring. Key takeaways on the attrition strategy.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Russia is testing warheads designed to cut cables with its Geran drones over Kyiv. In the most recent recorded case, the cables of the Yuzhniy bridge held up under the impact.
## What is being tested
Russia has turned **Kyiv** into a testing ground for new warheads for its **Geran** drones. The goal is not to bring down structures: it is to cut cables. The munition is designed to sever the cables hanging from bridges, according to open-source conflict monitoring. In the latest test, the cables of the **Yuzhniy** bridge withstood the impact. There was no cut.
## Why it matters economically
A bridge does not collapse because one cable is broken. The cost of replacing the cable is low compared with the cost of keeping traffic flowing. Replacing a section is cheap; closing the crossing, even for a few hours, is not. The attack seeks to force the defender to commit budget and personnel to constant repairs. It is a recurring bill, not a one-off blow.
## The asymmetry of the cheap drone
A **Geran** costs a fraction of what the system trying to intercept it costs. The logic is attrition: forcing the defender to spend more than the attacker spends. The cable holding up once does not change that equation. It only takes one hit.
## What is being tested
Russia has turned **Kyiv** into a testing ground for new warheads for its **Geran** drones. The goal is not to bring down structures: it is to cut cables. The munition is designed to sever the cables hanging from bridges, according to open-source conflict monitoring. In the latest test, the cables of the **Yuzhniy** bridge withstood the impact. There was no cut.
## Why it matters economically
A bridge does not collapse because one cable is broken. The cost of replacing the cable is low compared with the cost of keeping traffic flowing. Replacing a section is cheap; closing the crossing, even for a few hours, is not. The attack seeks to force the defender to commit budget and personnel to constant repairs. It is a recurring bill, not a one-off blow.
## The asymmetry of the cheap drone
A **Geran** costs a fraction of what the system trying to intercept it costs. The logic is attrition: forcing the defender to spend more than the attacker spends. The cable holding up once does not change that equation. It only takes one hit.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (1 replies).
More summaries
-
Unverified Tweet Sparks F-35 Nuclear Alert on Iran
An analyst's tweet claims Israel sent an F-35 with a nuclear bomb toward Iran. No evidence supports this EMP attack scenario.
-
France to drug-test ministers and senior officials
France will require ministers and senior officials to take saliva drug tests. Lecornu's circular raises doubts about its effectiveness and possible…
-
Brazilian official kills children then himself over infidelity fears
A Brazilian high-ranking official kills his two children and himself, sparking debate on marriage fragility and wounded pride.
-
Maricarmen, evicted Madrid tenant, dies at 87
Maricarmen, the 87-year-old tenant evicted in Madrid, has died after being hospitalized since her forced removal.
-
Spain has the most extreme land collapse in the Western world, says Mike Bird
Mike Bird places Spain as the most extreme land collapse in the West: an asset that concentrates 35% of global wealth and serves as bank collateral
-
Over 1,000 migrants reach Canary Islands in pirogues in just 24 hours
More than 1,000 migrants arrive on El Hierro in Spain's Canary Islands aboard seven pirogues in 24 hours. The island has already received over 6,000 this year.