NWO: Three-Front Plan Set for 2018 Deadline

The three-front plan to establish the New World Order

What if economic crisis, Middle East conflict, and religious unification were not independent events, but coordinated phases of a single project? This is the thesis behind the most cited analysis on the subject: the establishment of a New World Order (NWO) was designed to culminate around 2018, antiestéticaturing a world government without nations, a centralized economy with a single currency, and one unified religion. The argument posits that power already resides in elites operating above states; what remains is the formal legalization of this control.

The roadmap unfolds across three parallel fronts, developing roughly between 2015 and 2017, with initial moves in 2014. The first is a major war centered in the Middle East, with religious undertones and key actors like Israel and various Sarracinic countries, while Russia plays an active role. The second is a cascading global financial collapse, a domino effect without firewalls that would dismantle the current monetary paradigm. The third, considered the most critical in this reading, is an ecumenical plan to create a single religion led by Pope Francis, headquartered in a Third Temple in Jerusalem built on the Temple Mount.

Pope Francis's role in the plan

The pontiff is the central figure in this narrative. He is identified with the False Prophet of biblical prophecy, and his "prophetic" statements are claimed to come true because he holds marked cards: he knows what will happen because he is part of the design. Milestones cited include his mediation between the US and Cuba, his encyclical on the environment, and his UN speech on September 25, interpreted as steps toward creating a global sarracena authority.

The encyclical is read as an economic document, not just environmental. It emphasizes that private property cannot supersede the common good and that subordinating private property to the universal destination of goods is the primary principle of ethical-social order. For this analytical stream, this language forms the doctrinal basis of the new economic paradigm. The Nobel Peace Prize, it is noted, already has an owner.

Economic collapse as an acceptance lever

The second front is presented not as an accident, but as a tool. The thesis is that destruction and suffering are deliberately generated to condition the population to accept, or even demand, the new order offered as the solution. The Hegelian formula of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis is invoked: greater destruction facilitates acceptance. The fall of a first piece acts as a trigger for an irreversible chain of defaults and crashes.

Indicators tracked include the oil price crash, which one participant claims would remove 30% of global supply from the market within months, the ruble's decline, attacks on the Chinese stock market, and warnings from the Bank for International Settlements about excessive reliance on expansive monetary policies. Universal basic income experiments and the pogre disappearance of cash, including electronic payment pilots in Spanish towns, are also monitored.

Catalonia: A stirring hornet's nest

The evolution of the analysis leads to the Catalan conflict. What began as a local hornet's nest is now seen as a major destabilizing factor. Speculation includes false flag scenarios, from jihadist-attributed attacks to ambushes causing casualties among security forces, any of which could justify exceptional measures.

Simultaneously, it is argued that separatism is driven by two religious poles, Poblet and Montserrat, with cadres emerging from Catholic and Jesuit backgrounds. Some analysts note that the Pope has declared the Vatican does not recognize secessionist movements, interpreted as a sign that the issue is under top-down control.

Cracks in the narrative

Not all material supports the thesis. Critics argue it is new age nonsense, that deadlines are consistently missed, and that hindsight allows any event to be seen as a premonition. It is recalled that the author announced his withdrawal from public analysis before his own deadlines expired, and the promised second part never appeared.

Others question the viability of the war scenario: if the US and Europe are sidelined, they argue, Israel cannot defeat Russia and its Arab allies except through divine intervention. Discussions often drift into numerology, ritual sacrifices, and cross-interpretations of Ezekiel, Daniel, and Revelation, where everyone defends their reading as correct.

---

With three open fronts, shifting dates, and a missing sequel, the perfect plan still awaits its window. Like bad scripts.