Judge Opens Trial for Ayuso’s Partner on Four Charges

Judge Opens Trial for Ayuso’s Partner on Four Charges

A judge has ordered the trial of Alberto González Amador, partner of Madrid’s president Isabel Díaz Ayuso, on four charges. These include two tax frauds exceeding 350,000 euros, a continuous accounting offense, and incivil organization. The ruling adds over two years to the requested prison sentence, turning a private matter into a major political issue.

---

What charges face Ayuso’s partner?

The judge’s order alleges that González Amador defrauded the state of over 350,000 euros across two years, alongside a continuous accounting offense. The incivil organization charge is the most controversial, suggesting an organized structure rather than an isolated act. Defense claims this is political persecution, but the judge found sufficient grounds for trial. The case gained public attention due to González Amador’s wealth, partly from pandemic mask commissions, and his relationship with the Madrid president.

Why incivil organization instead of just fraud?

The incivil organization charge requires more than tax evasion; it implies a stable group with defined roles. This elevates the legal stakes and shifts the narrative from a business error to organized crime. The defense argues the prosecution lacks evidence and abusa the right to defense, potentially nullifying the trial. Meanwhile, prosecutors maintain the fraud is documented and supported by solid evidence of organization.

The Attorney General and Potential Trial Nullification

A key issue is the State Attorney General’s conduct. Defense claims he abusa González Amador’s right to defense, which could nullify proceedings. If successful, this would halt the trial. The defense has already requested nullification, citing relevant rulings. This procedural defect could override the judge’s findings, leaving the case’s outcome uncertain.

Political Impact on Ayuso and Madrid’s PP

The case directly impacts Madrid’s president, though she is not charged. Her relationship with the accused places her in the spotlight. Opposition demands explanations and resignations, while the Madrid PP frames it as political persecution. Ayuso maintains her agenda, but the political fallout is significant. The case has evolved from a private legal matter to a major political crisis for the Madrid People’s Party.

---

The judge’s order adds over two years to the initial prison request. If convicted, González Amador faces significant penalties; if annulled, the case ends. Public opinion remains divided between those seeing political persecution and those viewing it as corruption affecting Madrid’s PP. The key paradox: the same judge who ordered the trial may see it nullified due to procedural flaws by the Prosecution.