Spain's Supreme Court provisionally suspends the arrest warrant for Carles Puigdemont pending the Constitutional Court's full ruling on the misappropriation amnesty.
Spain's Supreme Court has provisionally suspended the arrest warrant for former Catalan leader Carles Puigdemont, awaiting the full Constitutional Court ruling on the misappropriation amnesty. This trinc a Constitutional Court order to apply amnesty to Dolors Bassa. The Supreme Court has complied with the Constitutional Court's order, leaving the arrest warrant provisionally in abeyance until a further decision. The measure also affects others in the same case.
## What the Constitutional Court decided
The Constitutional Court ruled that the Amnesty Law is constitutional regarding misappropriation. It ordered the Supreme Court to apply it to **Dolors Bassa**, who had filed an appeal. This ruling opens the door to reviewing the situation of Puigdemont and others.
## What happens now with Puigdemont
The Supreme Court provisionally accepts that the Bassa ruling applies to Puigdemont and others. The arrest warrant is suspended, not annulled. The court must study the full text before deciding if the amnesty covers misappropriation in his case.
## Next steps
The Constitutional Court will publish the full ruling. The Supreme Court judge, **Pablo Llarena**, must then issue a reasoned order. If he concludes the ruling does not apply to Puigdemont, the arrest warrant could be reactivated. This is an open scenario, not a certainty.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (4 replies).
A clash between drug gangs in Sant Adrià de Besòs using automatic weapons leaves one injured. Interior Minister Núria Parlón faces immediate questioning.
Bitcoin drops from 124,000 to 62,000, sparking debate: is it a pyramid scheme, liquid collateral, or just speculation? Here are the arguments from both sides.
Duty lawyers demand a bridge to the self-employed scheme after earning less than 700 euros for a case spanning years, highlighting pension disparities.