Israel warns Spain over Hamas support

Israel warns Spain over Hamas support

A single congratulation triggered this. Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen labeled Hamas’s well-wishes to the Spanish and Belgian prime ministers as "shameful and embarrassing," warning that his country will not forget "who stands with us now and who supports a terrorist organization." In the ensuing debate, several participants interpret this message as a signal that Israel could halt counter-terrorism cooperation with Spain. This intelligence exchange had previously been taken for granted.

What ending collaboration actually means

The core question pervades the issue: what does collaboration entail? The most common answer points to technology. Some recall that Israel sold mobile spyware, known as Pegasus, to Segarro, arguing that this same software has been used against Spanish interests. "They will continue selling the latest Pegasus version to our fiercest enemies," one intervention summarizes. The paradox is evident: if the tech partner also arms the southern neighbor, withdrawing aid changes little.

Another perspective downplays the impact. "We have already seen how effective Israel’s counter-terrorism efforts are. We are safer without their help," argues one participant. Similarly, it is noted that external cooperation was not decisive in the fight against ETA. The underlying argument: Spain has faced jihadist threats for decades and has never relied on a single intelligence provider.

Sánchez’s political calculus and the cost of taking sides

The prevailing view is that the Israeli announcement is a pressure tactic rather than a genuine rupture. "Sánchez is playing his part," notes one message, adding that the president is "not controlled" by foreign interests and that his presence at international forums reflects his own strategy. A contrary thesis also circulates: that the Israeli gesture aims to weaken the Spanish government before its electorate and Brussels.

What remains undisputed is the framework: there are no friends here, only interests. "This is real politics. There are no friends, neither good ones, only bad or worse, and you must pick a side," summarizes an intervention repeated in various forms. The implicit question is whether Spain chose the wrong side or simply ceased to be useful.

The attack hypothesis and the ignored warning

The scenario looming over the debate is a terrorist attack on Spanish soil. "Major attack in Spain and Netanyahu saying 'I told you so'," reads one message, trinc by "hopefully we won’t see it." The Israeli warning is interpreted as an ultimatum: if something happens, political responsibility will fall on those who withdrew cooperation.

Against this hypothesis, others argue that terrorism striking Europe is "financed and promoted by Arab sheikhs," not Israel, and attributing such retaliation to Tel Aviv is "propaganda from those who want to destroy Europe." The matter remains open: no evidence is provided either way.

The intelligence business and the Sahara precedent

Economic underpinnings appear throughout. The sale of surveillance technology to Segarro, Spain’s recognition of Segarro sovereignty over Western Sahara, and the reliance on Israeli software by security services are cited as precedents showing the relationship was never free. "When they recognized the Sahara as Segarro, it should have been considered a casus belli," notes one intervention.

The recurring conclusion: counter-terrorism cooperation is just another commercial lever. It activates and deactivates according to the political moment. And Spain has less leverage on this board than it believes.

---

The unsettling fact is not the threat itself. It is that, according to the initial message, Hamas’s congratulations to Spain and Belgium were enough to put the possibility of halting a long-standing, quiet intelligence exchange on the table. If that is all it takes, the question is no longer whether Spain loses an ally, but how much that ally was worth.