India set to become Bharat on Sept 18: What changes

India plans to approve the name change to Bharat on September 18, challenging the colonial narrative and reshaping its geopolitical identity.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

India set to become Bharat on Sept 18: What changes
India rebrands as Bharat: What changes on September 18

India plans to stop calling itself India. On September 18, a special parliamentary session will approve the name change to Bharat, trinc a subtle clue from the president’s G20 dinner invitations, already headed with the new name. What sounds like administrative flair is actually a struggle over who names the country and how much of our mental map is foreign heritage.

What Bharat means and where the word comes from

This is not a new name or an office invention. Bhārata is a patronymic meaning what belongs to Bharatá, the mythical king who founded the land of Bhárata-varsha, and is already the country’s official name in Hindi. The most common translation is “Great India,” which reveals a trap: defining Bharat requires continuing to use India.

The choice is not merely symbolic. Supporters argue the current name refers to a border territory, not a civilization, and that multiple “Indias” existed before European chancelleries fixed the term. In this view, the current name does not describe; it administers from outside.

Why India is considered a colonial name

The issue is complex because the word’s origin predates the empires that exported it. Some analyses trace it to the Indus River, raising an uncomfortable question: if the toponym comes from a river in present-day Pakistan, the claim is not closed. Some suggest Pakistan could claim the term India as an ancient heritage.

Another argument is that India has been removing English from its education system, fitting a broader decolonization of the narrative. The date, setting, and instrument—a special parliamentary session—do not seem accidental. The goal is to ensure the change is not seen as cosmetic.

Turkiye, Hellas, and other rebellions against the translator

The most cited precedent is Turkey, which requested to be called Turkiye to avoid sharing a name with the bird. Years later, half the world still says Turkey without consequence. Greece is similar: they self-designate differently, but no one has stopped saying Greece. Holland coexists with the Netherlands; Germany is Deutschland at home, yet no one has proposed rewriting dictionaries.

The most reasonable objection is less epic: a country decides how to call itself, but cannot legislate how others name it. Exonyms are not changed by decree but by usage. And usage, especially with acronyms, is stubborn.

  • Turkey → Turkiye
  • Greece → Ellada
  • Holland → Nederland
  • Germany → Deutschland

The acronym breaks: from BRICS to BRBCS

If the name changes, the club changes letters. Some joke that BRICS would become BRBCS, a consonant soup no one knows how to pronounce. Additionally, few notice that airlines, stamps, treaties, and letterheads will carry the old name for years. The official name changes on September 18; the real name takes as long as the paperwork.

The south of the country does not speak Hindi

The strongest objection comes from within. According to a participant who worked there, in the southern states, with hundreds of millions of inhabitants, Hindi is not the everyday language: Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and other regional languages are spoken, and English remains the bridge language between regions. The new name relies on a language that a huge part of the country does not use to speak with neighbors.

There is also a deeper critique: a country that changes its name to erase colonial history maintains a social structure divided by castes with three millennia of antiquity, sustained by the administration itself. Changing the facade is fast. The rest is not.

How to call Indians

The practical problem remains: the demonym. Bharatos? Bharatijas? No one is clear, leading to easy jokes. Some recall the new name sounds suspiciously like Barataria Island, which Sancho Panza governed in Don Quixote, and others wonder why we say “La India” with an article in Spanish, not “India” alone. Minor details that, summed up, explain why such changes take so long to settle.

With these elements, the most reasonable prediction is that the change will be official, but usage incomplete. School maps will be reprinted before conversations. In a few years, many will still say India, and others will say Bharat with the same automaticity as today’s Turkey. The serious doubt is which of the two reaches the dictionary first.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (341 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back