Spain as a political entity was not the product of a carefully drawn plan, but the result of premature deaths, unexpected inheritances and dynastic lines that died out by pure chance. A quick look at the succession of the Catholic Monarchs (the joint rule of Isabella and Ferdinand in the late 15th century) reveals a string of accidents: after Isabella's death, Ferdinand the Catholic remarried and had a son who died at birth. Had the boy survived, the crown of Aragon would have separated from that of Castile, breaking the dynastic union that gave rise to modern Spain.
Infante Miguel de la Paz, heir to Castile, Aragon and Portugal, died at the age of two, dashing the possibility of an Iberian union under a single crown. And Juana la Orate (Joan the Mad), fourth in the line of succession, ended up inheriting only because everyone ahead of her died or was ruled out. If Juana la Beltraneja had inherited Castile, we might today be speaking of a union with Portugal. Defenders of manifest destiny argue that Spain was a "universal unity of destiny", but the facts suggest that every step toward unification hinged on a failed pregnancy, a child's death or an unexpected will. The question of whether Spain was founded by chance finds more than one affirmative answer in the data.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (15 replies).
The 1054 schism explained: filioque, papal primacy, the Orthodox Bible and three of the four Marian dogmas. What still separates Rome from Constantinople.
A photo of women with almond blossoms bidding farewell to a kamikaze pilot reopens the debate on honour, sacrifice and misogyny in Second World War Japan.
Historian Miguel Ángel del Arco Blanco argues that Spain's postwar famine was political, not merely a legacy of the war. Family memories and rationing data fuel the debate.