Forum post claims "human equals POO" and calls for humanity's end
A post on an economics forum claims that "human equals POO" and calls for the disappearance of the family and the elimination of the species. Here is what it actually says.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
A message posted on an economics forum claims that human beings are an "aberrant organic waste" and calls for "collective euthanasia of the species". The text mixes contempt for economic debate, attacks on the traditional family and a divine self-proclamation by its author.
The text opens with a premise it presents as an axiom: "Human equals POO". From there, its author dismisses any economic conversation and reduces current affairs to a repetitive cycle of scandals, elections and celebrity deaths. The economy and the stock market, it says, are "fictitious institutions controlled to the millimetre" from offices in **New York**. No data is provided to support that claim.
## A premise presented as an axiom
The message does not argue: it decrees. It calls an equivalence between human beings and waste an "axiomatic truth", and from there ridicules those who debate economics and the stock market. It accuses them of "playing sophisticated intellectuals" while, in its view, repeating the same nonsense. It is an opinion without proof, not an analysis.
The contempt also extends to the news. A train accident, an election or the death of a public figure are, in its account, links in a "neurotic and infinite loop". The text mentions no specific case and no figures.
## The traditional family in the crosshairs
The author calls for families to "disappear immediately" and for the species to stop reproducing "under the excuse of flesh and friction". It is an extreme position on the family, stated without data or nuance, which the text presents as a logical consequence of its initial premise.
It also denies the idea of God as a "puerile tale" invented to cover up misery. Immediately afterwards, the author declares himself a divinity: "the true divinity was always me". The contradiction is explicit in the text.
## "Collective euthanasia" and the closure of the species
The ending is a call to eliminate the human species, which it calls "aberrant organic waste" that "must be removed from the cosmic fabric". It phrases this as "collective euthanasia" and as an official closure under his signature. There will be no amendment, pardon or extension, he writes.
The message does not identify any specific person or group, but its conclusion affects the entire species. It is an extreme opinion posted on a forum, with no factual backing, not a proposal with any scientific or legal basis. Any debate about health or the value of human life should rely on professionals and verified sources.
The text opens with a premise it presents as an axiom: "Human equals POO". From there, its author dismisses any economic conversation and reduces current affairs to a repetitive cycle of scandals, elections and celebrity deaths. The economy and the stock market, it says, are "fictitious institutions controlled to the millimetre" from offices in **New York**. No data is provided to support that claim.
## A premise presented as an axiom
The message does not argue: it decrees. It calls an equivalence between human beings and waste an "axiomatic truth", and from there ridicules those who debate economics and the stock market. It accuses them of "playing sophisticated intellectuals" while, in its view, repeating the same nonsense. It is an opinion without proof, not an analysis.
The contempt also extends to the news. A train accident, an election or the death of a public figure are, in its account, links in a "neurotic and infinite loop". The text mentions no specific case and no figures.
## The traditional family in the crosshairs
The author calls for families to "disappear immediately" and for the species to stop reproducing "under the excuse of flesh and friction". It is an extreme position on the family, stated without data or nuance, which the text presents as a logical consequence of its initial premise.
It also denies the idea of God as a "puerile tale" invented to cover up misery. Immediately afterwards, the author declares himself a divinity: "the true divinity was always me". The contradiction is explicit in the text.
## "Collective euthanasia" and the closure of the species
The ending is a call to eliminate the human species, which it calls "aberrant organic waste" that "must be removed from the cosmic fabric". It phrases this as "collective euthanasia" and as an official closure under his signature. There will be no amendment, pardon or extension, he writes.
The message does not identify any specific person or group, but its conclusion affects the entire species. It is an extreme opinion posted on a forum, with no factual backing, not a proposal with any scientific or legal basis. Any debate about health or the value of human life should rely on professionals and verified sources.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (8 replies).
More summaries
-
Why did humans develop consciousness?
A post argues that consciousness emerged as a semantic armor for the most defenseless primate. The hypothesis invites a fresh look at what science says about its origin.
-
We Say NO to the Human Being
A text describes the human being as biological waste and a pathology that devastates ecosystems. It claims consciousness is a hypertrophy and is signed by the author of a work.
-
Humanity must disappear, says Spanish manifesto
A text signed by Nando el Hispano argues that humanity is a parasitic entity and puts the number of animals slaughtered each year at up to 300 billion. Here is what it says.
-
Spain's private security sector: jobs but near minimum wage
Spain's private security sector in 2026: immediate employment but salaries near the minimum wage, cronyism and highly unequal services. An analysis of a labour market.
-
Brussels weighs capping fuel tank size in plug-in hybrids
The EU has not approved a tank size limit, but the tightening of plug-in hybrid type approval opens the door to reducing it.
-
There's no safest carriage on a train: it depends on the type of crash
Neither the rear nor the middle: the safest carriage depends on whether the crash is a head-on collision, a rear-end impact or a derailment. Statistics offer no single answer.