Forum debate targets the most criticized professions: civil servants and politicians
A thread lists eight professional groups and proposes civil servants as the catch-all category. The discussion drags on and descends into personal insults.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Forum debate targets the most criticized professions: civil servants and politicians
A list of eight professional categories—politicians, judges, journalists, police officers, doctors, nurses, teachers, and civil servants—and an uncomfortable question: which of them attracts the most social rejection? The answer that emerges almost unanimously from the analysis is not the one many would expect. It's not politicians. It's civil servants, the catch-all category that fits almost everyone else. The discussion, which drags on for more than two years, starts with a seemingly innocent list and ends up becoming a settling of scores with the State, its employees, and those who support them with their taxes.
Which professions generate the most rejection and why
The starting point is misleading: an unordered enumeration. Consensus breaks down immediately. Some argue that civil servants encompass all the others, including journalists, because in the end they depend on public funds through subsidies, contracts, or salaries. Under that logic, the list is reduced to a single category. Others disagree and place politicians first, with an argument that is repeated: they control all the powers of the State and the rest of the professions act as transmission belts.
The discussion heats up when judges enter. Part of the analysis places them ahead of politicians, with the thesis that without their complicity political corruption would not prosper. Personal experience sneaks into the argument: some claim to have suffered up close the combination of harm and judicial corruption, and describe it as incomparable. In response, another current argues that there are no corrupt judges without politicians who allow it.
Doctors and nurses, outside the list?
One of the most tense moments comes with healthcare. Someone explicitly asks that doctors and nurses be left out of the ranking. The response is blunt: not mine. And there a sustancia ilegal opens that runs through the entire analysis. For some, healthcare personnel are victims of protocols they do not control. For others, they are the link that applies harmful decisions without questioning them. The mention of pandemic healthcare management appears as a recurring argument, with explicit reproaches for their role during those months.
Teachers occupy their own place in the discussion. One intervention defines them as the profession that causes the greatest social harm, with the thesis that they enslave kids during the best time of their lives. The accusation does not go unanswered: some recall that they are civil servants and that their room for maneuver is set by law. The dispute over whether the teacher is an executioner or an executor of a system returns again and again.
The role of journalists and the fourth estate
The journalists category sneaks into almost all combinations. The most repeated argument is that they sell themselves to the highest bidder and that their capacity for manipulation exceeds that of other professions. Some place them ahead of judges in social harm. The criticism extends to subsidized media, which charge the public purse through journalistic companies with public aid. The conclusion that is repeated: if civil servants are counted, journalists are already included.
The list expands on its own initiative. Unions, prosecutors, State attorneys, tax inspectors, marketing experts, and even bankers appear. The civil servants category becomes the catch-all where almost everything fits. The underlying question is whether the problem is the profession or the system that sustains it.
The voter as ultimate responsible party
The discussion takes a turn when the voter is pointed out. One intervention formulates it bluntly: what is truly perverse is the rabble that allows the outrages. Another goes further and argues that politicians are not to blame for being as they are, because they are the reflection of the society that votes for them. Responsibility shifts from the officeholder to the citizen. It is the argument that causes the most discomfort and the one that is least rebutted.
The conversation descends into personal confrontations, with insults going back and forth. The initial list is forgotten. The analysis becomes a settling of scores with the State, its employees, and those who vote for them. The conclusion that emerges, without consensus, is that the problem is not a specific profession, but the structure that connects them.
The disconcerting fact: in more than two years of discussion, no one has proposed eliminating the list. Only reordering it.
A list of eight professional categories—politicians, judges, journalists, police officers, doctors, nurses, teachers, and civil servants—and an uncomfortable question: which of them attracts the most social rejection? The answer that emerges almost unanimously from the analysis is not the one many would expect. It's not politicians. It's civil servants, the catch-all category that fits almost everyone else. The discussion, which drags on for more than two years, starts with a seemingly innocent list and ends up becoming a settling of scores with the State, its employees, and those who support them with their taxes.
Which professions generate the most rejection and why
The starting point is misleading: an unordered enumeration. Consensus breaks down immediately. Some argue that civil servants encompass all the others, including journalists, because in the end they depend on public funds through subsidies, contracts, or salaries. Under that logic, the list is reduced to a single category. Others disagree and place politicians first, with an argument that is repeated: they control all the powers of the State and the rest of the professions act as transmission belts.
The discussion heats up when judges enter. Part of the analysis places them ahead of politicians, with the thesis that without their complicity political corruption would not prosper. Personal experience sneaks into the argument: some claim to have suffered up close the combination of harm and judicial corruption, and describe it as incomparable. In response, another current argues that there are no corrupt judges without politicians who allow it.
Doctors and nurses, outside the list?
One of the most tense moments comes with healthcare. Someone explicitly asks that doctors and nurses be left out of the ranking. The response is blunt: not mine. And there a sustancia ilegal opens that runs through the entire analysis. For some, healthcare personnel are victims of protocols they do not control. For others, they are the link that applies harmful decisions without questioning them. The mention of pandemic healthcare management appears as a recurring argument, with explicit reproaches for their role during those months.
Teachers occupy their own place in the discussion. One intervention defines them as the profession that causes the greatest social harm, with the thesis that they enslave kids during the best time of their lives. The accusation does not go unanswered: some recall that they are civil servants and that their room for maneuver is set by law. The dispute over whether the teacher is an executioner or an executor of a system returns again and again.
The role of journalists and the fourth estate
The journalists category sneaks into almost all combinations. The most repeated argument is that they sell themselves to the highest bidder and that their capacity for manipulation exceeds that of other professions. Some place them ahead of judges in social harm. The criticism extends to subsidized media, which charge the public purse through journalistic companies with public aid. The conclusion that is repeated: if civil servants are counted, journalists are already included.
The list expands on its own initiative. Unions, prosecutors, State attorneys, tax inspectors, marketing experts, and even bankers appear. The civil servants category becomes the catch-all where almost everything fits. The underlying question is whether the problem is the profession or the system that sustains it.
The voter as ultimate responsible party
The discussion takes a turn when the voter is pointed out. One intervention formulates it bluntly: what is truly perverse is the rabble that allows the outrages. Another goes further and argues that politicians are not to blame for being as they are, because they are the reflection of the society that votes for them. Responsibility shifts from the officeholder to the citizen. It is the argument that causes the most discomfort and the one that is least rebutted.
The conversation descends into personal confrontations, with insults going back and forth. The initial list is forgotten. The analysis becomes a settling of scores with the State, its employees, and those who vote for them. The conclusion that emerges, without consensus, is that the problem is not a specific profession, but the structure that connects them.
The disconcerting fact: in more than two years of discussion, no one has proposed eliminating the list. Only reordering it.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (103 replies).
More summaries
-
Spain's 'eyebrow journalists': complicit silence and no money returned
Journalists who whitewashed corrupt politicians in exchange for public money. The debate over whether they should pay it back and the pattern of media impunity.
-
Viral Mercadona receipt comparing 2016 and 2026 is fake, and prices haven't doubled
The viral Mercadona receipt comparing 2016 and 2026 is fake: different products, a non-existent street and a papyrus-like texture. Real inflation is far below double.
-
Spain's PP returns to its 2023 playbook: attack VOX and lose
The PP is reviving its attacks on VOX and calls for tactical voting while part of its right-wing electorate defects to VOX, according to debate commentary.
-
Strange screen of colors appears over Monterrey, fueling simulation claims
A viral tweet shows a rectangular structure of colors over the sky of Monterrey and attributes it to a simulation. Here's what's behind the phenomenon and why it's spreading.
-
Mamadu may have been born in Spain but still has an IQ of 64
An X post uses the death of three Iberian lynxes to mock a suspension of Vinicius. The lynx remains endangered: around 1,100 individuals in 2023.
-
Water control becomes the ultimate lever when inflation spirals
An analysis of how access to water turns into a tool of social and economic pressure when the basic supply fails. Read on to understand the mechanism.