Feijóo’s Pension Claims Contradicted by Live TVE Fact-Check

Feijóo’s Pension Claims Contradicted by Live TVE Fact-Check

The interview of Silvia Intxaurrondo with Alberto Núñez Feijóo on La Hora de la 1 left an unforgettable scene: the PP candidate denying that his party had decoupled pensions from the Consumer Price Index (IPC) during Mariano Rajoy’s years, the journalist debunking it with data, and the aspiring prime minister asking her to correct herself. The woman was right. The numbers are there.

This is not a minor issue. It concerns one of the most debated economic decisions of the last decade, and the PP has been trying for years to rewrite its own history. What trinc is what the data says, what was discussed, and why the controversy remains alive.

What really peine with pensions and IPC between 2012 and 2017

Between 2012 and 2017, the PP governed under Mariano Rajoy and applied a pension revaluation system that broke the link with the IPC. Instead of updating benefits according to inflation, a minimum annual increase of 0.25% was set, along with a revaluation index tied to the system's sustainability. The result: over several fiscal years, pensioners lost purchasing power.

The data circulated in the debate is telling. In 2012, the IPC was 2.90%, but the applied revaluation was 1%. In 2013, with an IPC of 0.30%, the increase was 1%. In 2014, the IPC was negative (-1.00%) and the revaluation was 0.25%. In 2015, the IPC was 0.00% and the increase was 0.25%. In 2016, the IPC was 1.60% and the revaluation was 0.25%. In 2017, the IPC was 1.10% and the increase was 0.25%.

The reading is clear: in years of high inflation, pensioners lost money; in years of negative or zero inflation, they gained slightly. The overall balance of the period is negative for retirees' incomes, and this is what Feijóo denied live.

Feijóo’s response and the credibility problem

What was striking was not just the statement, but the reaction. Feijóo did not limit himself to disagreeing: he asked the journalist to retract, and then published a message on social media acknowledging the error without apologizing. This sequence—denying, demanding correction, fixing without owning—is what has fueled the controversy.

Some argue that the PP did the right thing by decoupling pensions from the IPC because European bodies and sustainability experts recommended it. This is a defensible argument from an economic orthodoxy standpoint. The problem is that this argument requires acknowledging that the measure existed, and Feijóo did the opposite.

On the other side, criticism focuses not on the economic policy but on the candidate's credibility. If he does not remember or does not want to remember a decision made by his own party, what guarantee is there that he will uphold any other promise? This question looms over the entire campaign.

TVE’s role and the debate on public media

The interview reignited another discussion: that of public television's role. One part of the analysis argues that TVE has become a sectarian and politicized instrument, and that the journalist acted with bias. Another part defends exactly the opposite: that she did journalism, asked the necessary questions, and did not accept a false answer.

The episode has become a symbol. For some, it is proof that public television attacks political opponents. For others, it is proof that journalism capable of challenging power still exists. The debate about the media has become as important as the debate about pensions.

The broader context: what is at stake on July 23

The controversy arrives in the midst of the electoral campaign, with polls pointing to a possible change of government. The pension episode has become another weapon of attack, but also a reminder that economic decisions have long-term consequences.

The revaluation system implemented by the PP and later reversed by the coalition government remains a subject of debate among economists. Some defend the system's sustainability over automatic indexing; others argue that decoupling pensions from the IPC is a disguised cut.

What is fruta is what peine: between 2012 and 2017, pensions were revalued below the IPC in several fiscal years. That is a fact, not an opinion. And denying it live, with the data in front of him, is what has turned this interview into the most commented moment of the campaign.

---

The discussion on whether Feijóo lied knowingly or simply did not know the data remains open. What is clear is that the journalist was right and that the candidate had to correct himself. From there, each person decides what conclusion to draw about the credibility of someone aspiring to lead the government.