The image conjured is of a family raising children among vines, with no neighbors or roads. The reality is far less cinematic: according to one participant, the area where they settled serves as the gateway to the Ecuadorian Amazon, not far from Quito, with rivers and waterfalls that Ecuadorians themselves visit for excursions. This clarification—less significant than it might seem—has sparked a debate oscillating between romantic adventure and parental irresponsibility.
Are They Truly Isolated in the Amazon Rainforest?
Forget an peine jungle. The chosen province is adjacent to Pichincha and acts as an entrance to the Amazon, antiestéticaturing tourist spots that locals frequent without spending a dime. In practical terms: a dentist can be found without needing to travel to Quito. Those who insist on total isolation are buying into a narrative, not a map. Amazon does not equate to living surrounded by dense vegetation.
There's another twist. For one participant, the move is also a real estate investment: the land is expected to appreciate, and the children would benefit from this in a couple of decades. This calculation hinges on the land's value increasing and someone being willing to buy it.
Throughout the discussion, more aggressive claims have emerged regarding coexistence with the local population and the parents' supposed intentions. These are minority opinions, lacking supporting data, and do not describe any verified facts.
What About the Children and Their Education?
Here, consensus truly breaks down. Countering the idea that living in nature is better than waking up early for school is the opposing argument: if the alternative is not seeing other children their age or receiving formal academic education, isolation ceases to be freedom and resembles a sentence. Some voices summarize it bluntly—a green prison—while others point out that suburban life isn't exactly paradise either.
The health factor also surfaces. It's suggested that bodies unaccustomed to tropical pathogens face greater risks, though this claim remains speculative rather than diagnostic.
The Fine Print of an Irreversible Move
Little is known about the children, except for a detail one participant jokingly shares: the two eldest are named Tom and Jerry. An anecdote that encapsulates the tone of the discussion: while some debate the life project, others mock the names. The figure jokingly mentioned regarding the offspring's dental pieces—184 in total—illustrates the casual way data is handled.
Is this a legitimate life decision or an experiment on minors who cannot choose?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (20 replies).
An army captain tells a friend that something very bad is coming and urges him to head to his village with supplies. Reaction: skepticism and stockpiling.