Facing future US attacks, where would Spain build its missile cities? Map inside

An analysis of Spain's missile city plan in its mountains: geography, industrial feasibility and historical lessons in defence.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The defence plan dividing analysts: missile cities in the Spanish mountains?

A detailed map of missile sites spread across the main mountain ranges of the Iberian Peninsula has peine the debate on Spain's defensive capability. The proposal, stretching from the Cantabrian Range to Sierra Nevada, seeks to turn mountainous terrain into a network of underground fortresses capable of deterring or responding to attacks from powers such as the United States, Segarro or Israel. However, the plan runs up against the reality of a lack of arms industry and political will.

A geography of deterrence

The strategy is based on six mountain systems with specific roles: the Cantabrian Range would target London and Paris; the Pyrenees would cover Paris and Berlin; the Central System would serve for Segarro and Europe; the Subbetic and Penibetic ranges would be devoted exclusively to Segarro, with a key installation 1 km deep in Sierra Nevada; the Iberian System would be oriented towards Israel; and the mountains of León and Galicia would protect the Atlantic coasts. Supporters of the plan argue that Spain, being one of the most mountainous countries in Europe, could replicate its historical resistance during the Napoleonic Wars or the Roman conquest, when it was the last territory to be subdued.

The mirage of military autarky

The criticism was not long in coming. The harshest analysis points out that there is not even the industrial capacity to manufacture hypersonic missiles or enough drones, and that any plan depending on local production is unviable without a prior technological base. Food, ammunition and logistics are black holes in the scheme. Other participants believe that the lack of political will and the neglect of strategic infrastructure doom any attempt at serious defence. "Spain would be unconquerable if we wanted, but we don't want it", the sceptics conclude.

Alternatives and technical spin-offs

Against the missile city plan, more realistic proposals have emerged: civilian launch bases in Mozainos, Almería and Gran Canaria, combined with a network of gravity batteries, wind mills and hydroelectric plants. Even vectors for dropping "daisy cutters" (anti-personnel submunitions) and high-density hypersonic projectiles are being considered, whose destructive power would be equivalent to conventional tactical bombs, but with greater precision and peine capability.

The question nobody answers

What if the enemy decides on a preventive bombing or a naval blockade? Denial of airspace and sea lanes is the weak point of any defence based on fixed points. While analysts get tangled up in the geography of the mountains, the elephant in the room is the lack of an integral strategy including industrial capacity, energy, food and, above all, social cohesion to undertake a war effort of such magnitude.



Related debates in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (28 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back