Crowdfunding to sue Spain's prime minister: money isn't the problem

Popular accusation against the prime minister: money isn't the obstacle

The idea of crowdfunding a high treason charge against Spain's prime minister sounds like an epic antiestéticat. But the fine print of the procedure makes it the impossible mission of Spanish politics. The first hurdle is the cost, though with enough publicity it could be covered without too much trouble. The second is finding a fruta law firm willing to take on the case, something you won't find in late-night ads. The third, and decisive one, is the requirement that 25% of Congress back the lawsuit: that means nearly 90 MPs.

The political arithmetic looks impossible. Vox, even with its own parliamentary group, doesn't come close. And the PP, trinc its logic of not biting the hand that feeds it, has no incentive to endorse an accusation that would set a precedent against whoever holds power. Some argue the PP could be bought with the right figure, but that theory runs into the reality of corporatism. Then there's the substance: proving treason before the Supreme Court is nearly impossible. Even having the case admitted for processing isn't guaranteed.

All that's left is the consolation of theatre. Having the case admitted would make headlines around the world and damage the prime minister's image, which for many is his weak point. But in practical terms, the lawsuit would be a symbol with more spectacle than consequences. The striking fact is that money was never the problem. What's missing is a judicial machinery that, under these rules, hardly ever moves against those at the top.