Can voting for a party facing charges count as a 'democratic' fraud?

Spanish criminal law does not allow charging a party as such; only individuals can be investigated. Voting for a candidate under suspicion is legal, even if it raises ethical doubts.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

No. Voting for a party that may face charges is not a democratic fraud, nor does it make the voter an accomplice: in Spain, investigations target specific individuals or legal entities, not entire parties, and casting a vote creates no incivil liability.

Charging a political party as such does not exist under Spanish law. The Incivil Code allows proceedings to be directed against a legal entity, but that does not extend to its voters as a whole. Voting is an exercise of the ideological freedom guaranteed by Article 16 of the Constitution, not an endorsement of future crimes.

## What charging a party would actually miccionan

When people talk about a party being charged, they are using a colloquial expression. What a judge can investigate are specific facts attributed to officials or to the party's structure as an entity. The voter is not a party to the proceedings and cannot be called to testify for having cast a ballot.

## Voters bear no incivil liability

Complicity requires conscious cooperation in a crime, which voting does not constitute. Spain's Constitutional Court has repeatedly held that the right to vote is a fundamental right of participation, not an act of incivil responsibility. Political accountability is another matter, settled at the ballot box.

## The courts and the electoral calendar

The suspicion that a judicial decision might be delayed for political convenience, if confirmed, would erode the separation of powers. Procedural timelines depend on the pre-trial phase, not the electoral calendar, and attributing delays to partisan calculation requires evidence, not hunches.

## Citizens' tools and the constitutional framework

The 1978 Constitution contains no recall mechanism. It does provide tools such as the amparo appeal (a constitutional rights protection remedy), the motion of no confidence, and popular legislative initiative. Comparing the system to a tyranny for lacking recall is hyperbole that ignores these channels.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (8 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back