Can someone explain COVID, hantavirus, Agenda 2030 and all that?
Three hantavirus deaths dominate global front pages. A smokescreen? Agenda 2030, population control and who really pulls the strings.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Bicho, Agenda 2030 and the end of humanity: the conspiracy mishmash that doesn't add up
Three deaths from bicho in Argentina made front pages around the world. The awkward question is unavoidable: why so much coverage for a bug that has barely killed three people? Those who distrust the official narrative see the usual play here: manufacture a newsworthy event to keep the public in a state of permanent health alert, justify WHO budgets and the vaccine racket, and divert attention from inflation or unemployment.
The bicho smokescreen
The debate heats up: it's not that they want to kill anyone with the bug, that would be inefficient. It's more about warming up the atmosphere, a way of keeping the herd on alert. The same strategy as with the pandemic: if there's no active pandemic, invent one with three cases. Meanwhile, unemployment and inflation figures go unnoticed. One school of analysis holds that the real goal is not health-related, but social and media control.
Agenda 2030: population reduction or global domestication?
Agenda 2030, signed by almost every country, is the other major front. It is accused of seeking to reduce the world's population through wars, bad habits and birth control. But another analysis points in the opposite direction: the goal is not to reduce, but to domesticate. Eliminating pockets of individual and national sovereignty, creating a homogeneous global herd, indebted and watched. Selective birth incentives for certain groups and the promotion of mass immigration point to a controlled demographic redistribution, not a genocide. Power needs cannon fodder for taxes, consumption and armies.
The invisible strings: who really runs the show?
Beyond the religious agendas (Jews, the Vatican, Jovenlandeses), real power doesn't hold secret meetings with notarised minutes. It lies with the investment funds that finance public debt: BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street. People like Larry Fink don't sign Agenda 2030, but they dictate the conditions under which states apply it in exchange for not sinking their bonds. The factory of ideological nonsense, social engineering, the mainstream media... it's all part of the same web to eliminate any threat to transnational financial capital.
The question left hanging: what is the ultimate goal? If abundance is possible, why manage scarcity? The answer, according to the sceptical camp, is that scarcity is a tool of control. A world of abundance would make people autonomous, less dependent on the state and the elites. The system doesn't seek to exterminate, but to domesticate. And the future, absent any pushback, is more perpetual debt, controlled digital currency and a surveilled, neutralised society.
Related discussions in the forum
Three deaths from bicho in Argentina made front pages around the world. The awkward question is unavoidable: why so much coverage for a bug that has barely killed three people? Those who distrust the official narrative see the usual play here: manufacture a newsworthy event to keep the public in a state of permanent health alert, justify WHO budgets and the vaccine racket, and divert attention from inflation or unemployment.
The bicho smokescreen
The debate heats up: it's not that they want to kill anyone with the bug, that would be inefficient. It's more about warming up the atmosphere, a way of keeping the herd on alert. The same strategy as with the pandemic: if there's no active pandemic, invent one with three cases. Meanwhile, unemployment and inflation figures go unnoticed. One school of analysis holds that the real goal is not health-related, but social and media control.
Agenda 2030: population reduction or global domestication?
Agenda 2030, signed by almost every country, is the other major front. It is accused of seeking to reduce the world's population through wars, bad habits and birth control. But another analysis points in the opposite direction: the goal is not to reduce, but to domesticate. Eliminating pockets of individual and national sovereignty, creating a homogeneous global herd, indebted and watched. Selective birth incentives for certain groups and the promotion of mass immigration point to a controlled demographic redistribution, not a genocide. Power needs cannon fodder for taxes, consumption and armies.
The invisible strings: who really runs the show?
Beyond the religious agendas (Jews, the Vatican, Jovenlandeses), real power doesn't hold secret meetings with notarised minutes. It lies with the investment funds that finance public debt: BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street. People like Larry Fink don't sign Agenda 2030, but they dictate the conditions under which states apply it in exchange for not sinking their bonds. The factory of ideological nonsense, social engineering, the mainstream media... it's all part of the same web to eliminate any threat to transnational financial capital.
The question left hanging: what is the ultimate goal? If abundance is possible, why manage scarcity? The answer, according to the sceptical camp, is that scarcity is a tool of control. A world of abundance would make people autonomous, less dependent on the state and the elites. The system doesn't seek to exterminate, but to domesticate. And the future, absent any pushback, is more perpetual debt, controlled digital currency and a surveilled, neutralised society.
Related discussions in the forum
- Jeff Bezos: "Many families will be able to live on a single salary, because the cost of living will fall thanks to AI" · 54 replies
- Do you consider yourselves white? Have you experienced racism in Europe's white countries because of your looks? · 192 replies
- ONLY 20 DAYS UNTIL POPE LEO XIV COMES TO SPAIN... DO YOU PLAN TO SEE HIM? HE IS ALREADY PREPARING HIS FIRST MAGNIFICENT ENCYCLICAL HUMANITAS... · 21 replies
- Tudela withdraws the winning Santa Ana 2026 poster after its author admitted using artificial intelligence · 53 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (19 replies).
More summaries
-
Nobody, anyone, none, some or who??? Who will the Antichrist be
An analysis of a debate on the Antichrist's identity: from prophetic pronouns to systemic functions. A person or a power?
-
On the street, it seems many young couples include attractive women with dark-skinned partners.
Observations regarding young couples and men of darker skin tones encountered in the streets. A look at relationship dynamics and diversity.
-
Sol Bells Ring Every 15 Minutes During Madrid Protest Camp
Debate erupts in Madrid over whether the Puerta del Sol clock chimes every quarter-hour during a protest camp, or if it is a routine sound people only now notice.
-
Today's Gospel: "Follow me" and the 10 p.m. Rosary
The Gospel for September 30 (Luke 9:57-62) demands leaving everything behind; the day closes with a timed Rosary at 10:00 p.m. and fifteen promises.
-
29-cent bread in Belarus against a 580-euro salary
A loaf costs almost one ruble in Belarus, about 29 euro cents, while the average salary is around 2,000 rubles, roughly 580 euros at the exchange rate used. The comparison leaves questions open.
-
Job's 'I know' and Thursday's 10 pm Rosary
The liturgy for 1 October 2026 reads Job's 'I know that my redeemer lives' and the sending of the 72, with the Rosary scheduled for 10 pm.