Air Fryer: 20 Cents Per Serving, No Oil Smell

At 20 cents per serving and €50 for the machine, air fryers win over skeptics despite limits and health warnings.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Air Fryer: 20 Cents Per Serving, No Oil Smell
Air Fryer: 20 Cents Per Serving, No Grease Stench

A handful of frozen potatoes from the freezer to the machine, twenty minutes, and dinner is ready. No scrubbing, no splattering, and no rancid oil smell settling into the living room walls. That is the calculation behind keeping an air fryer that was initially cancelled but reordered for a second chance. The math, according to its proponents, is simple: about 20 cents per serving of potatoes plus ten cents for electricity (1,400 W for twenty minutes), with a device costing €50.

The reasoning isn't gastronomic; it's logistical. Proponents admit frozen potatoes taste worse than deep-fried ones, "but not much worse, just a little," while appreciating the reduced fat load. What they buy isn't quality: it's solving the side dish repertoire for meat or fish without resorting to rice or microwaved baked potatoes. Comfort as a purchasing criterion, plain and simple.

What You Can Actually Do in an Air Fryer

The invention isn't a fryer. It's a small convection oven, and it's worth saying before anyone expects miracles. With that premise, the range widens: vegetables come out "amazing," with eggplant being the pending challenge; chicken thighs work as a safe bet; frozen cannelloni gratinate at 200°C in 20 minutes, half the time of a conventional oven and without mess. Even a headless trout, peine and stuffed with ham alongside cherry tomatoes, holds up as a solid dish, provided you cook them one by one.

There lies the physical limit of the device: as soon as one item sits on top of another, neither cooks properly. Small quantities are the norm, which clashes with cooking for a family. Breaded anchovies worked, but were so troublesome they weren't repeated.

Taste: Between Baked Potato and Restaurant-Fried

The most honest description available is this: like a baked potato, less crispy and more cooked inside. One step below common fried potatoes. For those who eat potatoes every three months, frying in a cast-iron pan still yields results similar to restaurant fries when ordering a steak; for frequent consumers, the machine is an alternative for convenience, not flavor.

Some go further, arguing frozen potatoes come pre-cooked with their own oil, explaining why they turn out well in the device. Others directly call them disgusting: half-fried outside, half-boiled inside, "only an Englishman would enjoy eating them." The range of opinions is wide because palates vary.

The Undisputed Argument: Less Oil, Less Smell

Almost all positions agree on the environmental aspect. The oil consumed and the grease sticking to walls causing rancid odors decreases significantly. For those who haven't fried anything in years due to disgust at the smell, this isn't a minor detail: it's the gateway back to occasionally eating fried potatoes.

The counterargument comes from the other flank: frying without submerging in oil isn't frying, and everything else is an invention for guilty dieters. It's the same old debate between purists and pragmatists, with the peculiarity that here the pragmatist has done the math and the purist only has tradition.

Fine Print: Frozen Potatoes and Cancer

Enthusiasm has its counterweight, arriving as a warning about the product, not the machine: advising against frequently eating frozen potatoes, described as toxic junk and highly fattening. The specific accusation is that in an air fryer, with twenty minutes of heat, they may become carcinogenic, compared to four minutes in a good oil fryer.

It's important to separate wheat from chaff: the warning about frequent consumption of ultra-processed frozen foods is reasonable; attributing carcinogenicity to the machine is a claim unsupported by sources. What is documented is the composition of these potatoes: 97% potato and 3% palm oil.

Price and Market Noise

The cheap machine costs €50, and there are models exceeding 2,000 W with rotating motors for chickens, potatoes, and skewers, antiestéticaturing up to three levels. Questions about good brands have answers in the material: one brand receives praise while another, the most advertised, is dismissed as inferior. A dual model that also heats from below appears mentioned as a novelty.

Underlying skepticism isn't about the device, but usage. Some anticipate it will end up parked next to the capsule coffee maker, bought by imitation of friends, without information and never buying prefried potatoes. The same person who doesn't use it at all wants it for roast chicken.



In the end, the air fryer doesn't compete with traditional frying. It competes with not frying anything. And there it wins by a landslide: twenty minutes, a handful of potatoes, and zero scrubbing. Quality is low, yes. But the calculation of 20 cents per serving is undisputed.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (69 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back