1,872 social housing units for 45,000 applicants: the numbers don't add up in Bizkaia
Bizkaia announces 1,872 VPO social housing units for 45,000 registered applicants. Less than 4.2% coverage. A controversial allocation, ghetto risks and the debate over who benefits.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
1,872 social housing units for 45,000 applicants: the numbers don't add up in Bizkaia
The announcement of 1,872 new public housing units for rent in Bizkaia sounds like a political victory, but the numbers tell a different story. Registered demand stands at 45,000 people, according to the plan's own data. Coverage falls short of 4.2%. Figures that, on their own, call into question the real reach of the measure, beyond the headline.
The geographic split: Bilbao takes the lion's share, the rest is scattered
More than half of the homes will be located in Bilbao. The rest will be spread across Getxo, Sopela, Sestao and Muskiz, among other municipalities. A distribution that already raises eyebrows, especially when you remember that Getxo has traditionally been a stronghold of high incomes. Seeing social housing in Neguri is, at the very least, a striking anomaly.
The antiestéticar of ghettos: the Nordic example and the silent warning
Those who analyse public housing policies point to a risk: if too many social housing units are concentrated in certain areas, the pattern of deprived neighbourhoods repeats itself. The reasoning is simple: a small percentage of problematic residents is manageable, but beyond a certain threshold, problems grow exponentially. In Sweden and Denmark, areas where social housing exceeded a certain percentage have been demolished to prevent ghettos. The Bizkaia plan does not appear to have taken note.
The debate over beneficiaries: who gets the cheap housing?
Another line of argument holds that this type of housing ends up in the hands of groups with very low incomes, while those earning average wages are left out, forced to compete in the private market. The paradox: you pay taxes so that others can live better than you on a lower salary. A distortion that, according to some, rewards mediocrity and discourages effort. Seen this way, the outlook is bleak for the middle class.
The 1,872 homes are a step, but a tiny one. Demand is 24 times higher. Without a change of scale, public housing will remain a patch, not a solution.
The announcement of 1,872 new public housing units for rent in Bizkaia sounds like a political victory, but the numbers tell a different story. Registered demand stands at 45,000 people, according to the plan's own data. Coverage falls short of 4.2%. Figures that, on their own, call into question the real reach of the measure, beyond the headline.
The geographic split: Bilbao takes the lion's share, the rest is scattered
More than half of the homes will be located in Bilbao. The rest will be spread across Getxo, Sopela, Sestao and Muskiz, among other municipalities. A distribution that already raises eyebrows, especially when you remember that Getxo has traditionally been a stronghold of high incomes. Seeing social housing in Neguri is, at the very least, a striking anomaly.
The antiestéticar of ghettos: the Nordic example and the silent warning
Those who analyse public housing policies point to a risk: if too many social housing units are concentrated in certain areas, the pattern of deprived neighbourhoods repeats itself. The reasoning is simple: a small percentage of problematic residents is manageable, but beyond a certain threshold, problems grow exponentially. In Sweden and Denmark, areas where social housing exceeded a certain percentage have been demolished to prevent ghettos. The Bizkaia plan does not appear to have taken note.
The debate over beneficiaries: who gets the cheap housing?
Another line of argument holds that this type of housing ends up in the hands of groups with very low incomes, while those earning average wages are left out, forced to compete in the private market. The paradox: you pay taxes so that others can live better than you on a lower salary. A distortion that, according to some, rewards mediocrity and discourages effort. Seen this way, the outlook is bleak for the middle class.
The 1,872 homes are a step, but a tiny one. Demand is 24 times higher. Without a change of scale, public housing will remain a patch, not a solution.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (16 replies).
More summaries
-
Bilbao flat prices: bubble or market reality?
Analysis of Bilbao's housing crisis: why aren't protected flats selling and how does the market affect affordability?
-
Why Spanish Workers Bought Homes in the 1960s but Can't Today
Six million social homes, cheap land, and zero taxes enabled working-class homeownership in Spain. Here is why that model has collapsed.
-
PSOE Spokesperson Mínguez Faces Questions Over Partner's 30 Rentals
Data on the 30 rental properties owned by PSOE spokesperson Montse Mínguez's partner emerges, as she labels inquiries a personal attack.
-
Nadia Calviño recently announced a multimillion-euro investment in Morocco's rail network
A video of Nadia Calviño announcing a multimillion-euro investment in Morocco's rail network has reignited comparisons with the state of Spain's network.
-
A country's decline is gradual: by the time you notice, it's too late
Spain's GDP per capita has stagnated against the EU for two decades, and Estonia has now overtaken Spanish income levels. Compound interest explains why.
-
Spain's rail crash reignites political crisis, pressure mounts on Sánchez and PSOE
Two serious high-speed rail accidents in nine months and dozens of deaths have triggered a political crisis in Spain: the opposition demands the resignation of Sánchez and Puente.