Home
Business
Historical Court Case –
The Fluoride Cover Up Will Soon Be Exposed
Historical Court Case - The Fluoride Cover Up Will Soon Be Exposed
Analisis - CABALLERES. marcador paco burbujero. [Red to Green ] . DEL ROJO AL VERDE. estamos viendo la mayor MOVIDA EN DECADAS -> ECONOMIA-> TODO
Activism Article of the week Business Conspiracy Constitutional Rights Derrick Broze Domestic Policy Government Health Legal Politics Propaganda Social Engineering Top News
Historical Court Case – The Fluoride Cover Up Will Soon Be Exposed
Posted on
June 6, 2020 Author
Derrick BrozeComments(23)
La FAN comenzó su batalla legal en noviembre de 2016 cuando se unieron con cinco organizaciones y cinco individuos para presentar una Petición Ciudadana bajo la Sección 21 de TSCA a la EPA. La Petición Ciudadana pide a la EPA que prohíba la adición de productos químicos de fluorización al agua de los EE.UU. basado en el creciente conjunto de pruebas que muestran que el flúor es una neurotoxina en dosis que se utilizan actualmente en las comunidades de los Estados Unidos.
Los demandantes en el caso incluyen: FAN, Moms Against Fluoridation, Food & Water Watch, la Academia Americana de Medicina Ambiental, la Academia Internacional de Medicina Oral y Toxicología y la Asociación de Consumidores Orgánicos.
Los demandantes han presentado estudios a la corte detallando la evidencia de daño neurotóxico como parte de sus hallazgos propuestos. El Dr. Paul Connett, PhD, director de FAN, señala un número de estudios recientes que detallan el efecto de la fluoración en los niveles de IQ.
"Hasta el año 2020 ha habido 72 estudios de COCIENTE INTELECTUAL Y flúor, de los cuales 64 encontraron un CI más bajo entre los niños con mayor exposición al flúor",
declaró Connett. "Muchos de los estudios anteriores se realizaron en lugares con elevados niveles de flúor natural. Ahora hay pruebas muy sólidas de que el flúor daña tanto el cerebro del feto como el del niño en los niveles utilizados en las áreas fluoradas artificialmente".
Si bien el tribunal permitirá que FAN presente pruebas relacionadas con los daños causados por la fluoración del agua, el tribunal ha declarado que la EPA no puede presentar información relacionada con los supuestos beneficios de la fluoración. El movimiento fue visto como una victoria para FAN y los oponentes de la fluoración. La EPA también intentó excluir a tres expertos de hablar en el juicio. Sin embargo, la corte falló en contra de la agencia y permitirá el testimonio de los expertos. Entre los expertos se encuentran el Dr. Philippe Grandjean de Harvard y la Universidad del Sur de Dinamarca, el Dr. Howard Hu de la Universidad de Washington y el Dr. Bruce Lanphear de la Universidad Simon Fraser de Columbia Británica.
El juicio comenzará el 8 de junio a través de Zoom. Informaré sobre el juicio para El último vagabundo americano. Manténgase en sintonía para los informes y artículos de video diarios.
¿Qué es el fluoruro?
Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor
www.DeepL.com/Translator
A historical trial weighing the risks of water fluoridation is set to begin in San Francisco on Monday June 8.
For the last four years, attorneys with the Fluoride Action Network have been fighting a legal battle against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency over whether water fluoridation violates the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). A recent ruling by the judge in the case has now set the stage for a federal trial which will include three international experts in neurotoxicity testifying on the dangers of water fluoridation.
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is set to argue that water fluoridation violates the TSCA provisions which prohibit the “particular use” of a chemical which has been found to present an unreasonable risk to the general public. Under section 21 of the TSCA citizens are allowed to petition the EPA to regulate or ban individual chemicals.
The FAN began their legal battle in November 2016 when they joined with five organizations and five individuals to present a
Citizens’ Petition under Section 21 of TSCA to the EPA. The Citizens’ Petition calls on the EPA to prohibit the addition of fluoridation chemicals to U.S. water based on the growing body of evidence showing that fluoride is a neurotoxin at doses currently used in communities around the United States.
The plaintiffs in the case include: FAN, Moms Against Fluoridation, Food & Water Watch, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology and the Organic Consumers Association.
The plaintiffs’ have presented studies to the court detailing the evidence of neurotoxic harm as part of their Proposed Findings of Fact. Dr. Paul Connett, PhD, director of FAN, points to a number of recent studies detailing the affect of fluoridation on IQ levels.
“As of 2020 there have been 72 fluoride-IQ studies, of which 64 found a lower IQ among children with higher fluoride exposure,” Connett stated. “Many of the earlier studies were in places with elevated natural fluoride levels. There is now very strong evidence that fluoride damages both the fetal and infant brain at the levels used in artificially fluoridated areas.”
While the court will allow FAN to present evidence related to the harms caused by water fluoridation, the court has stated that the EPA cannot present information related to the purported benefits of fluoridation. The move was seen as a victory for FAN and opponents of fluoridation. The EPA also attempted to exclude three experts from speaking at the trial. However, the court over ruled the agency and will allow the expert testimony. Experts include Dr. Philippe Grandjean of Harvard and the University of Southern Denmark, Dr. Howard Hu of the University of Washington, and Dr. Bruce Lanphear of Simon Fraser University in British Columbia.
The trial is set to begin on June 8th via Zoom. I will be reporting on the trial for
The Last American Vagabond. Stay tuned for daily video reports and articles.
What is Fluoride?
The substances added to municipal water supplies known by the name “fluoride” are actually a combination of unpurified byproducts of phosphate mining. In the United States thousands of tons of fluorosilicic acid is recovered from phosphoric acid plants and then used for water fluoridation. During this process the fluoride ion is created.
This process of taking waste from the phosphate industry and putting it into drinking water has long been criticized for its
effects on human health and the environment. It is well known that water fluoridation has led to
dental fluorosis for
millions of children. This discoloring of the teeth was called “cosmetically objectionable” by the Centers for Disease Control.
Beyond the cosmetic effect there have been several studies indicating overwhelming health issues related to fluoride, especially for children.
Another study found a connection between exposure to water fluoridated at relatively low concentrations and a reduced IQ among children.
As recent as September 2017 the journal
Environmental Health Perspectives published the study “
Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6–12 Years of Age in Mexico,” examining the results of prenatal exposure to fluoride and the potential health concerns. The researchers called the study “one of the first and largest longitudinal epidemiological studies to exist that either address the association of early life exposure to fluoride to childhood intelligence or study the association of fluoride and cognition using individual biomarker of fluoride exposure.” The study was funded in part by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
The researchers found that higher prenatal fluoride exposure was associated with lower scores on tests for cognitive function at age four, and between ages six and twelve. The researchers acknowledge that their results are “somewhat consistent” with past ecological studies which indicate children living in areas of high fluoride exposure have lower IQ scores than those in low-exposure areas.
A study published in the journal General Dentistry warns that infants are at risk of dental fluorosis due to overexposure from fluoride in commercially available infant foods. The researchers analyzed 360 different samples of 20 different foods ranging from fruits and vegetables, chicken, turkey, beef, and vegetarian dinners. Chicken products had the highest concentrations of fluoride, amowed by turkey.
The New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation (NYSCOF) reports that the fluoride levels were due to pesticides, fertilizers, soil, groundwater, and/or fluoridated water. The high levels found in the chicken and turkey can be attributed to “fluoride-saturated bone dust” involved in the process of mechanically separating the meat.
Another study
published in Environmental Health found a potential connection between fluoride exposure and the prevalence of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. The researchers studied data on ADHD among children age four to seventeen collected in 2003, 2007 and 2011 as part of the National Survey of Children’s Health, as well as state water fluoridation data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) collected between 1992 and 2008 . It is the first study to analyze the relationship between exposure to fluoridated water and ADHD prevalence.
The team discovered that children living in areas with a majority of the population receiving fluoridated water from public water systems “tended to have a greater proportion of children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD. ” The researchers concluded that:
“this study has empirically demonstrated an association between more widespread exposure to fluoridated water and increased ADHD prevalence in U.S. children and adolescents, even after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES). The findings suggest that fluoridated water may be an environmental risk factor for ADHD.”
In addition to these studies related to fluoride and children, dozens of other studies have indicated a variety of health problems. A recent study published in the
Journal of Analytical Chemistry indicates that fluoride ions found in fluoridated water and toothpaste may lead to an increase in Urinary Stone Disease (USD). The study was conducted by chemists from Russia and Australia, led by Pavel Nesterenko at the University of Tasmania. The team studied 20 urinary stones from patients at a Russian hospital and discovered fluoride ions in 80% of the stones. This could be due to high levels of fluoride in patients’ urine, possibly from drinking water containing fluorides and ingesting fluoride toothpaste.
A study
published in the BMJ’s Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health confirmed fluoride’s negative effect on the thyroid gland and a possible connection to depression, weight gain, and other negative health effects. Researchers with the University of Kent in England examined thyroid activity for those in areas with fluoridated water and those without. The team examined 95 percent of the English population in 2012 and 2013 and found that high rates of underactive thyroid were 30% more likely in areas with high fluoride concentration. An underactive thyroid can lead to depression, weight gain, fatigue and aching muscles.
Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.
