The dream of making a living on YouTube has become an experimental laboratory. An initial message asks a direct question: what kind of faceless, AI-generated stories—script, visuals, music—could work? The answer is a catalog of ideas ranging from humor with deepfakes to barn cats. If there is consensus, it is that you won't become a millionaire, but you might earn enough for Doritos.
AI as a Tool and a Problem
The rise of generative video tools has multiplied experiments. Some argue that the current niche is AI video itself: channels that create humor, modify movies, or change series endings. But reality clashes with technique. One participant reports needing two hours and three burned accounts to produce an eight-second video. Automation with Make or n8n also creates synchronization disasters that end up online anyway.
Monetization adds another obstacle. A creator complains that monetization is being limited for any video antiestéticaturing a woman, even if she wears a hoodie. The platform applies filters that, in practice, function as preventive censorship.
From Trading to Cats: Niches That Work
Not everything is speculation. One participant created a trading channel with original content: it is not automated and allows them to learn while publishing. They admit it is not the best business model, but point to high CPMs and loyal traffic if the content is good. To promote it, they use Facebook because click-through rates are high in Latin America.
At the opposite extreme, another participant started filming the cats in their barn. In two days, they reached 1,000 views with two Shorts. The lesson is that analog and everyday content also has an audience.
AI Humor and Legal Limits
Humor generated with AI is one of the most explored paths. There is talk of creating voice deepfakes of celebrities without infringing copyright, provided the source is not explicitly named. The idea is not free of legal risks, but it circulates naturally.
Another approach is taking a random TikTok video and adding an invented story over it, with arrows and effects. According to one participant, this works.
Community as Business
Some propose building a community around YouTube niche creation and charging for access once it grows. It is the classic model: first free content, then a paywall. This connects with another detected niche: channels discussing YouTube strategies without having achieved anything relevant themselves.
The Face Problem
The discussion turns to a recurring theme: the need to show your face. One participant is clear: if you don't show your face, you will struggle. The response is ironic: if I show mine, I will struggle twice as much. So they will continue with AI-created videos. And if they succeed, great; if not, at least they exercise their brain.
There is no final conclusion. Ideas remain on the table, experiments continue, and no one has found the magic formula. All that remains is to keep trying.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (115 replies).
A channel creating fake celebrity videos with AI saw rapid growth from 43 to 78 followers in under two days before facing bans on TikTok and Instagram.
A worker has hindered his team for four months, mixing up backups and ignoring tasks. The group is exhausted by the constant errors in critical services.