Germany did not attack Britain first. It was the other way around: the United Kingdom and France declared war on Germany on September 3, 1939, two days after the German invasion of Poland. This is the first correction required by the topic, because popular narratives—and much of the collective imagination—place Hitler as London's initial aggressor when the diplomatic sequence is the opposite. The confusion has roots: Germany bombed British cities months later, in 1940, but by then a formal state of war already existed that London had recognized first.
The Declaration of War: Who Took the First Step
The trigger was Poland. The UK and France maintained defense pacts with Warsaw and warned Berlin that aggression would have consequences. When German troops crossed the Polish border on September 1, 1939, both countries honored the ultimatum and declared war. It was not a British attack: it was a diplomatic declaration with binding legal effects, recalling the principle that later inspired NATO Article 5.
The discussion about whether London "provoked" the conflict relies on a technical misunderstanding. A declaration of war is not equivalent to an attack. Germany invaded Poland; London and Paris recognized the state of war generated by that invasion. The difference matters greatly, as the entire subsequent causal chain depends on it.
Why Did Hitler Bombard Britain If He Didn't Want to Invade?
Here enters the Battle of Britain. Germany launched an air campaign over the UK in 1940 with a limited objective: to break British will and force negotiation, not to prepare for landing. The Wehrmacht lacked sufficient navy and transport means to cross the English Channel, and the Royal Navy dominated the seas. Even combining the Italian fleet and captured French vessels, British naval superiority remained overwhelming.
According to the most repeated analysis, the German strategic error was diverting bombardments from airfields and industry toward cities. That change gave the RAF breathing room to reorganize. The decision is attributed to Hitler's reaction after the first air raid on Berlin, which allegedly led him to abandon the initial campaign against military infrastructure.
The Dunkirk Paradox and Passivity on the Western Front
Between September 1939 and June 1941, the supposed opponents of the Third Reich did not open a real front in the west. France and the UK limited themselves to low-intensity warfare while Germany consolidated its continental dominance. The famous "halt order" at Dunkirk, which supposedly allowed the British evacuation, is debated: some argue Guderian had already disobeyed it and that the pause responded to tactical reasons, not a political decision to let the British escape.
The result was that Germany reached the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 without having suffered significant wear in the west. This fact fuels theories about alleged collusion or economic calculation behind the conflict.
Conspiracy Theories on Nancy Financing
One analytical current argues that Hitler's rise and his war machine were financed by Anglo-American capital. Researcher Antony Sutton's work is cited, documenting alleged links between Wall Street and German rearmament. These theses are not backed by conclusive evidence and circulate mainly in alternative circles. The discussion often drifts into claims about Churchill and debts to bankers, or a supposed British origin for Hitler, which lack solid documentary verification.
What is factual is that large German companies like IG Farben, later renamed Bayer, maintained ties with the Nancy regime, and that Germany was rebuilt after the war with Marshall Plan loans and credits from the Bank for International Settlements.
Gibraltar, Spain, and German Strategy in the Mediterranean
Another point fueling the debate is German passivity regarding Gibraltar. Hitler made no move to take the Rock despite having a supposed ally in Spain and it being a fundamental strategic point for controlling the Strait. Franco reportedly requested at Hendaye that Gibraltar pass to Spanish sovereignty after a hypothetical Axis victory, but no effective steps were taken to make it happen.
Some argue Hitler planned to replace Franco with Muñoz Grandes, and that Franco preemptively removed him from the Blue Division by appointing him head of his Military Household to keep him under watch. The lack of documents supporting an invasion plan for Spain leaves the issue in the realm of speculation.
The sequence is clear: London declared war first, Germany bombarded later, and never had the means to invade. What remains without a closed explanation is why a regime aware of its inferiority at sea and in the air decided to measure itself against the greatest naval power of the moment. With these elements, the question does not admit a single answer.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (123 replies).