Vox Opens Door to Supporting PP Without Red Lines

Vox signals support for the PP without red lines, calling it an 'advance'. The debate over whether this alliance solves or traps the electorate divides voters.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

PP and Vox: the alliance no one wants to admit

The news is that Vox has peine the door to supporting the PP without red lines, and Feijóo has taken up the gauntlet by calling it an 'advance'. The debate over whether this alliance is the solution to oust Sánchez or a trap that perpetuates bipartisanship has generated 122 responses in a politics forum. The discussion reveals a deep fracture: while some see the coalition as the only real alternative, others denounce that Vox has become a crutch for the PP and that its principles have been diluted in the name of governability.

The budget agreement in Valencia as a precedent

Mazón has announced a budget agreement with Vox that he hopes to finalize in the coming days. This move is interpreted as a test of what a national coalition might look like. However, the fine print of the agreement and mutual concessions raise questions about who comes out ahead. Some argue that Vox betrayed its principles by facilitating budgets that do not include their historical demands, while others defend it as a pragmatic step to demonstrate governing capacity.

The motion of censure as a double-edged sword

Abascal has stated that he would support a PP motion of censure with Junts 'to go to elections and without concessions to separatism'. This statement has ignited the debate: is it a strategic move to force elections or a disguised concession? The contradiction is evident: Vox criticizes pacts with Junts but is willing to facilitate a motion that would require their abstention. Confusion over whether supporting an investiture or a motion implies supporting policies has been one of the most discussed points.

Is Vox a crutch for the PP or a real alternative?

The accusation that Vox acts as a crutch for the PP has been answered harshly: 'For VOX not to be a crutch for the PP, and all CMs and PSOE trolls in this forum to be at ease, it must become totally irrelevant parliamentarily'. The argument is that a party with 30 deputies out of 300 and 10% of the hemicycle cannot be ignored. But the criticism persists: Vox has been shedding its most radical postulates to attract center-right voters, becoming a softer version of the PP.

The PP as blue PSOE: the thesis gaining ground

One of the most repeated currents is that the PP has become a 'blue PSOE'. It is argued that Feijóo opts for social democracy and 'tempered socialism', and that his policies will be identical to those of the PSOE. This idea is reinforced by examples such as Pons, who according to some 'works to pick up PSOE votes'. The conclusion of this line is that voting for the PP is voting for the PSOE with a different wrapper, and that the only difference is the media spectacle.

The church and the right: a broken relationship

Amid the political debate, a reflection arises on the role of the Church: 'The Church should realize that it has no allies in politics'. It is argued that the right undermines Catholicism less blatantly than the left, but it does so nonetheless. The conclusion is that the Church must become independent and do politics on its own, without trusting that the right will defend its interests.

The debate leaves an open question: if the PP and Vox represent the same thing with different wrappers, what real alternative is left for the voter who wants change? The answer, for now, is an uncomfortable silence.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (122 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back